Obama & Hillary: Call Christians Murdered in Sri Lanka Easter Worshipers

On this years Easter Weekend a Muslim Terrorist Group bombed several locations in Sri Lanka, killing hundreds of people in the process. The story continues to develop but so far Muslim Suicide Bombers took the lives of over 300 and wounded more than 400 after their attacks on three hotels, a housing complex, and three churches. A majority were killed attending church for Easter Sunday Service, Sri Lanka’s Government suspects that the Islamist terror group behind the attacks are called the National Thowfeek Jamaath. Among those killed or injured some happened to be tourists visiting Sri Lanka including Americans. After the attacks many rushed to social media to denounce the attacks against Catholics and Christians in Sri Lanka but Obama, Clinton, and other democrats including those who want to run for our 2020 presidential election refuse to identify the victims as such.

Former President Obama, Hilary Clinton, Julian Castro, Elizabeth Warren and other democrats referred to the victims of Sri Lanka this weekend as “Easter Worshipers”. It’s almost as if they couldn’t find that one simple word to describe these “Easter worshipers”… if only their was one word to describe them. Even ABC News and Main Stream media have decided to token the term “Easter Worshipers” just to avoid using the C word that apparently frightens them so much. I mean why is it that even Homeland Security refuses to acknowledge that Christians were murdered?

None of these Democrats have ever had an issue calling attacks on Muslims exactly what it is, an attack on Muslims or Islamophobia. Countless of times have they voiced themselves when it comes to the Islamic community and many times have they came to its defense. Granted, no one deserves this but to ignore the community that this effects by calling them Easter Worshipers really shows you what kind of people they are. There’s never been a time where Hillary or Obama referred to the Muslim community as the “Hijab Worshipers” or the “Ramadan Worshipers”. Why is it that they couldn’t bring themselves to simply say Christians, it was Christians and Catholics who were attacked and have been seeing a huge growth in persecution specifically by Muslim Terrorist groups all around the world. Christians are the highest persecuted Group around the world, but also the most ignored.

I’m not sure about you but as a Christian I find it very disrespectful to call us Easter Worshipers. I and no other Christian worships Easter, we worship Jesus Christ. After all the lives that were lost and all the people who were injured you dare to write a tweet referring to them as Easter Worshipers just to act like you care about Christians? The sad part is, these tweets look almost as if they were all on face-time group chat, one of them said “oh yeah, add Easter Worshipers so we won’t have to mention Christianity” and boom the tweets were formed. It’s just so ironic how all these tweets use the same phrase and say the same exact thing with different structure. You ever “copy” your friends essay but change up a few words, well there it is in these tweets. Democrats, you could try to ignore the fact that Christian persecution is real and its happening almost daily all you want but “Easter Worshipers”…Really… that’s just Shameful. I rather they not have said anything, none of you have ever fought against christian persecution don’t start acting like you care now just because the news is trending.

Honestly though, was there a memo sent out that the world should know about because the statistics behind all of this being accidental.. I’m pretty sure is close to some type of negative number. I guess that the left must believe that this is just another case of, some people who did something, to Easter Worshipers.

Written by Emmanuel Matos

Over 20 Years Later, Bill Clinton Still Doesn’t Regret Lewinsky Affair

By Stefan M. Kløvning

Washington, Politics – ‘I did not have sexual relations with that woman,’ Bill Clinton insisted in 1998 after the Drudge Report revealed ex-president Bill Clinton having had an affair with then-White House intern Monica Lewinsky, who at the time was 27 years younger than the president. The scandal caused a lengthy investigation which eventually led to Clinton being the second president, after Andrew Johnson in 1868, to ever have been impeached in the United States, and chose to fight the impeachment rather than resign voluntarily (as Nixon did in 1974). Since then, he has never apologized privately to Lewinsky, and on June 4, 20 years later, he informed in an interview for NBC that he wouldn’t do anything differently even if the #MeToo movement had as much momentum then as it has today. He also claimed that he had ‘done the right thing’ in the aftermath of the scandal and that a lot of the facts had been willingly omitted from the reportage.

His impeachment was not based on the affair in itself, but rather due to providing false testimony in the investigation and allegedly influencing Lewinsky’s testimony as obstruction of justice and perjury. The House of Representatives used 14 hours to debate before approving of the impeachment articles against Clinton. She wasn’t the only one. Paula Jones and Gennifer Flowers also had ‘sordid entanglements’ Clinton, according to Vanity Fair.

According to Lewinsky, nine sexual encounters occurred between herself and Clinton took place between November 1995 and March 1997. The Drudge Report reported Clinton to be the ‘love of her life,’ but later, Lewinsky seems to have gotten another perspective of the former president. On 25 February, Lewinsky published an essay for Vanity Fair looking back on the incidence in the ‘age of #MeToo,’ where she spoke of the event:

Now, at 44, I’m beginning (just beginning) to consider the implications of the power differentials that were so vast between a president and a White House intern. I’m beginning to entertain the notion that in such a circumstance the idea of consent might well be rendered moot. (Although power imbalances—and the ability to abuse them—do exist even when the sex has been consensual.)

In other words, Clinton isn’t guilty of having sexually assaulted Lewinsky, but the affairs ‘constituted a gross abuse of power’ according to her. Clinton doesn’t seem to think so, but he publically acknowledged for the National Prayer Breakfast in 1998 that he had ‘sinned.’ Looking back, he stands firmly by the decision to have stayed in office, claiming to have defended the constitution, and that 2/3 of the American public still supported him after the scandal. He has been accused of sexual harassment and misconduct on other occasions too, but also of sexually assaulting Juanita Broaddrick in her hotel room in the late 1970s.