Judy Munro-Leighton, the women who made sexual assault accusations about Justice Brett Kavanaugh and his friend raping her several times in the back of a car, has finally (prior to her previous claims) admitted the truth! Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley referred the women to the FBI and DOJ for further investigation.

The accusations made against Kavanaugh and his friend were made via a “Jane Doe” letter that was received by Sen. Kamala Harris, a Calafornia Democrat and committee member.

Ms Munro-Leighton when under investigation by the committee investigators, prior to her previous claims admitted that she had made false allegations towards Kavanaugh and she was not the author behind the “Jane Doe” letter.

Kavanaugh, told the high court on the 6th October that he “was infamously accused by multiple women of sexual assault and misconduct before the confirmation.”

Ms Munro-Leighton was forced to tell the truth when the lack of consistency in her story emerged.

Grassley’s office wrote:

“Given her relatively unique name, Committee investigators were able to use open-source research to locate Ms. Munro-Leighton and determine that she: (1) is a left-wing activist; (2) is decades older than Judge Kavanaugh; and (3) lives in neither the Washington DC area nor California, but in Kentucky.”

Is this down to her left wing ideologies?

Grassleys office continued to write:

“Under questioning by Committee investigators, Ms. Munro-Leighton admitted, contrary to her prior claims, that she had not been sexually assaulted by … Kavanaugh and was not the author of the original ‘Jane Doe’ letter.” Grassleys office sent this in their referral to the DOJ.

Grassleys office continued to write this in their referral for Ms Munro-Leighton:

“When directly asked by Committee investigators if she was, as she had claimed, the ‘Jane Doe’ from Oceanside California who had sent the letter to Senator Harris, she admitted: ‘No, no, no. I did that as a way to grab attention. I am not Jane Doe . . . but I did read Jane Doe’s letter. I read the transcript of the call to your Committee. . . . I saw it online. It was news.”

Grassleys office continued to write:

“In short, during the Committee’s time-sensitive investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Munro-Leighton submitted a fabricated allegation, which diverted Committee resources. When questioned by Committee investigators she admitted it was false, a ‘ploy,’ and a ‘tactic’,”  ““She was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation.”

This is the letter that Charles E. Grassley, Chairman and committee on the Judiciary, sent to the Attorney General Sessions and Director Wray:

Click to access 2018-11-02%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20FBI%20(Munro-Leighton%20Referral)%20with%20redacted%20enclosures.pdf

If only she hadn’t lied in the first place and it didn’t take a committee investigator to get the truth from her.

Although now proven innocent regarding the Ms Munro-Leighton case, Kavanaugh has been accused of several other assaults. Of which he has denied all allegations.

So still begs the question, is this man although been proved not guilty in the Ms Munro-Leighton case guilty at all?

By Alissa Cook-Gray





Click to access 2018-11-02%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20FBI%20(Munro-Leighton%20Referral)%20with%20redacted%20enclosures.pdf