Creepy Joe Biden is ‘NOT SORRY’ for Groping Little Girls

Mr. Joe Biden, The man who once-if not still, believed in segregation of school’s is completely under fire for sexual harassment. Biden’s actions have been documented for years and have went unchecked and unspoken about for too long. In the age of #metoo it seems like what’s been hidden in plain site for Joe Biden is finally coming out to the forefront. Biden has been groping, touching, rubbing, kissing, and even sniffing on little girls and women alike since he was Vice President.

COMPLETELY NOT NORMAL

Regardless of the fact that this isn’t just an allegation it seems like Joe Biden is receiving very ‘fair’ and favorable ‘consequences’. Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Leftists have come to the defense of Joe Biden and refuse to condemn his actions. How incredibly convenient that sexual harassment and abuse by Joe Biden’s creepy nature is simply dismissed by reason of “He’s affectionate” as said by Pelosi when asked to comment on Biden’s actions. If anyone remembers Brett Kavanaugh, he was eaten alive by the Main stream media and “I believe her” people without evidence and fueled on nothing but allegations; where are all those people now? Instead of condemning his actions, Democrats still want him to run for 2020 and they’re letting him off the hook extremely easy. As Nancy Pelosi said, maybe the women coming forward should just become members of the “Straight Arm Club” apparently this is her solution as she joked and made light of the situation, down playing it completely.

Amy Lappos, one of the women speaking out against Joe Biden said in an interview this week “It wasn’t sexual, I don’t think.. but it was incredibly uncomfortable.. he did grab me by the head,”. “He put his hand around my neck and pulled me in to rub noses with me. When he was pulling me in, I thought he was going to kiss me on the mouth” she told Courant. Amy was influenced to speak out after hearing Lucy Flores come out and talk about her encounter with former Vice President, Joe Biden. In an essay published on the Cut, former Nevada lieutenant governor nominee Lucy Flores told us that Biden came up to her, smelled her hair and gave her “a big slow kiss” on the back of her head. Lucy said that she felt “embarrassed” and “shocked.. I wanted nothing more than to get Biden away from me”. Biden claimed he had no memory that he “acted inappropriately,” but if he was in the wrong, he said he would “listen respectfully.” These are only two out of more women coming out against Joe Biden, what about all the children he did this to, who’s going to speak up for them?

The “we believe women” posse must be on vacation because truthfully I don’t see them. I’m glad women who can defend themselves are speaking out but I’m saddened over the children who couldn’t defend themselves. I’m sad because Democrats are coming to the defense of Joe Biden and it seem’s like no consequences can ever touch these huge democratic politicians. I’m not sure about you but Hannity said it perfectly “Democrats seem to get a free pass on everything, abuse of power allegations, claims of racism, sexual harassment…” and the list continues, he’s completely right.

Sofie Karasek was photographed holding hands and touching foreheads with Biden at the Oscars in 2016. During a Lady Gaga performance she stood with about 50 other sexual-assault survivors and the moment soon went viral, the Post even called the moment “powerful.” This week on the other hand Sofie told the Post that Biden actually violated her personal space. She also mentioned that she wasn’t impressed with Joe Biden’s two minute video response to the growing creepy allegations against him in which he never says he’s sorry Karasek is right, she said he “didn’t take ownership in the way that he needs to.”

“He emphasized that he wants to connect with people and, of course, that’s important,” Sofie said, “But again, all of our interactions and friendships are a two-way street.. Too often it doesn’t matter how the woman feels about it or they just assume that they’re fine with it.” Apparently this video that’s supposed to be an apology was enough for most Democrats to still want Joe Biden to run as president for 2020, sadly.

Donald Trump and anyone with common sense is definitely not okay with his video and didn’t take him serious at all. Joe Biden says that it is his responsibility, only to be mindful of the fact time’s have changed as he makes excuses for his behavior. Main Stream Media has sense shifted their view away from Joe Biden and on to President Trump. They didn’t like the fact he shared and pinned the above tweet where Joe Biden Gropes himself as he doesn’t apologize; they’ve spent the entire week covering it. Those who hold a strong hatred and dislike of the president have also mentioned his 2005 “Grab her by the P-ssy” comment which by the way is completely not the same as groping, rubbing, kissing, and sexually harassing kids and women.

It’s really concerning to me when someone can hear about Joe Biden, push it to the side, and bring up a ‘he said she said’ story about Trump. It’s truly concerning when people and main stream are literally defending, excusing, downplaying and batting a blind eye to Joe Biden and what he’s done to women and children. The worst part is – these are the same people who give him the confidence to make fun of the situation and also completely let us know that he’s NOT SORRY. This is simply not okay.

Written by Emmanuel Matos

Democrats: YAY To Murder!

The Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act has failed to pass in the U.S senate on Monday. This bill condemned and assured prison time to doctors who were not willing to save the lives of infants after a botched abortion.

The 2020 Democratic presidential candidates voted ‘Nay’ for the passing of the bill. These candidates include Kamala Harris (CA.), Bernie Sanders (VT.), Kirsten Gillibrand(NY.), Amy Klobuchar(MN.), Cory Booker(NJ.) and Elizabeth Warren(MA.) . The end vote was 53-44, only seven votes away from the 60 needed to pass the bill.

There were three Democrats who joined the Republican party to support the bill: Bob Casey(PA.), Doug Jone(AL.) and Joe Manchin(WV.) . unfortunately, three members of the Republican party were unable to vote because of flight delays. These members include Tim Scott(SC.), Kevin Cramer(ND.) and Lisa Murkowski(AK.).

The Born-Alive Abortion Act states that it would prohibit “A health care practitioner from failing to exercise the proper degree of care in the case of a child who survives an abortion or attempted abortion.” The act would have also assured that if the infant was to be alive after an attempted abortion, it would have identified as a legal person for all purposes under the law of the United States. The infant would immediately be entitled to all protections under our laws. The bill was set up to not persecute the mother who was involved in the abortion but to ensure that the infant receives immediate medical care. The safety and life of the infant is its primary focus.

In response to the opposition towards from the Democratic Party, President Trump tweeted on Monday that “this will be remembered as one of the most shocking votes in history of Congress.”

Trump states,”Senate Democrats just voted against legislation to prevent the killing of newborn infant children,” Trump stated. “The Democrats position on abortion is now so extreme that they don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth”. Senator Ben Sasse, who pushed the Born-Alive Abortion Act in 2017 was in utter shock and in disbelief at each vote that opposed the bill. He says that opponents lied continuously with blatant nonsense about the legislation stating, the bill will specifically end abortion entirely:

“This is about the most simple thing you can say, which is that a baby is a baby, and they have dignity and worth”, Ben Sasse stated. “And it’s not because they are powerful. It’s because they’re babies. Today is a sad day in the United States Senate.”

This issue goes beyond politics. This is about ethics; having values and morals that the Democrats lack. This is about having a heart. Having compassion for the lives of innocent human beings who have yet to have a voice. Infants depend on us to be the voice for them defend them by saving their lives,but we the people, Congress have failed them. We need to continue fighting for the lives of the voiceless. Their lives and future depend on us; literally.

  Written by Jazmin Minier

Democrats Try to Beto Smash the Border Wall

By: Gabriel E. Miller

In a recent MSNBC interview with Chris Hayes, Democrat Beto O’Rourke (the former senator candidate for Texas) said that he would take down the southern border wall.

O’Rourke said, “Yes, absolutely. I’d want to take the wall down.”

This may be a strategy that the Democrats try to use as a narrative for the 2020 Presidential Election, or it shows their true colors, that Democrats want open borders.

In January, Texas Democratic Congresswoman Veronica Escobar said in a CNN interview, “We know walls don’t work, that they don’t stop drugs, that they don’t stop immigration.” She also mentioned that she was open to destroying existing parts of the wall.

New York Democratic Senator Kristen Gillibrand told Fox News on Friday, “I could look at it and see which part he means and why if it makes sense I could support it.”

At the United States Hispanic Leadership Institute, O’Rourke said,


“We don’t need another wall, we don’t need another fence, because let me tell you this. Walls do not, as the president has claimed, save lives, walls end lives. In the last 10 years… 4,000 of our fellow human beings have lost their lives trying to cross into the United States to work jobs no one born in this country dare work. To be with family which is a human right, that we should honor.”


O’Rourke calls for illegal immigration on the basis that people should be with their families and because people died trying to commit an illegal act.

In Business Insider’s article listing the 50 most violent cities in the world in 2017, Tijuana, Mexico ranked number five. Tijuana is a border city with the United States’ city of San Diego. O’Rourke would compromise the security of the American people by taking down the border wall.

According to the New York Post, after the walls were erected in San Diego, it cut illegal border crossings by 95 percent.

This new attitude to border security is surprising as, in 2006, prominent Democratic leaders such as Chuck Schumer, Hillary Clinton, and then Senator Barrack Obama voted for a border wall.

Now Democrats, like Nancy Pelosi and others call the border wall “immoral”.

James Comey’s Warning To Democrats of Avoiding Socialism Falls on Deaf Ears

Written by Stefan M. Kløvning

Washington D.C. – Former FBI Director James Comey, known for his influence in FBI’s investigation of potential Russian interference in the 2016 election, warned his fellow Democrats on Sunday to avoid Socialism and self-proclaimed Socialists such as Ocasio-Cortez and to rather strive for a “sensible, balanced and ethical leadership.”

Comey was a longtime Republican prior to Trump’s rise and moved over to the Democratic Party under the last election campaign, claiming that the “Republican party has left me, and many others,” in adhering to Trump’s tactics and politics that deviated from what he perceived as “fulfilling the Founders’ design that ‘ambition must … counteract ambition,'” and called for the American people to vote Democrat in the mid-term elections.

Much of Comey’s convictions may be of his own accord, but his milieu appears to have influenced him moving leftwards politically.  After all, his wife is an ardent supporter of Hillary Clinton, along with four of their daughters, who participated in the Women’s March succeeding Trump’s inauguration. This may have influenced his several self-admitted “mistakes” under the 2016 investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server she used when she was Secretary of State. It didn’t stop Democrats like Nancy Pelosi, however, from calling Comey the “leading Republican political operative in the country,” for leading the investigation. In fact, he’s been hated by members of both sides of the spectrum after having participated in what has been perceived as a witch-hunt of both candidates for President in 2016. Now he appears to be a never-Trump Democrat, however, like his father, who told CNN in May 2017 that he thought Trump “should be impeached immediately. He’s a very incompetent guy. He’s out of his league. I think the man should be in a home quite honestly, he’s crazy as a hoot.”

Despite the legitimate concerns Comey may now have for the future of the Democratic party and its constituents, knowledge of his background has caused many Democrats to completely disregard his advice as worthless.

For instance, National Security Council Spokesman of President Obama, Tommy Vietor, responded to Comey, commenting on his judgement:

Progressive Democrat candidate for US Congress, Bill Cimbrelo, accused Comey of hypocrisy, along with many other vile accusations:

https://twitter.com/Bill_Cimbrelo/status/1021140418883457030

Dem strategist Zac Petkanas’ response was a tad more insulting:

https://twitter.com/Zac_Petkanas/status/1021142842972999680

Much of the rest falls on deaf ears…

https://twitter.com/SFGayMom/status/1021161398393450496

… but some are still willing to listen.

https://twitter.com/EdKrassen/status/1021132357829644289

According to Rasmussen Reports, only 13% of Americans believe that Socialism is a better economic system than Capitalism, but with Bernie Sanders’ large support during the 2016 primary elections, and Ocasio-Cortez’ victory in the NY primaries, many more Democrats appear to slide over to Socialism or at least view Socialism in a more positive light amid calls for free education, healthcare and housing, often confusing the terms “social democracy” and “Democratic Socialism.” Scandinavian countries, for instance, are often pointed to by supporters of the latter, while those countries, in reality, are social democracies whose welfare is built on the wealth produced by Capitalism.

It’s difficult to say how much opposition Ocasio-Cortez stands before against her Republican adversary Anthony Pappas in the general election on 6 November, considering he ran unopposed for the seat within his party. What appears to be the case, however, is that Socialism is gaining steam among left-wing reactionaries against Trump, along with its political promises for the youth and the poor of what they will supposedly gain by electing its candidates. Referring to the Democrats echo of Ocasio-Cortez’ call to “abolish ICE” and end immigration enforcement, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) told Breitbart last week that ““I don’t really refer to it as the Democratic Party anymore. This has become the New Socialist Democratic Party,” opining that the party has already fallen to the Socialism of Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders.

Polls Reveal Majority of Americans oppose the Democrats’ calls for abolishing ICE

 

By Stefan M. Kløvning

Washington, D.C., National Security – Succeeding Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ primary election victory on Tuesday as the Democratic candidate for New York Representative, the Democrats have increasingly echoed her call for abolishing the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE), calling into question the original purpose of the law enforcement agency. The 28-year-old candidate would be the youngest woman ever elected to the U.S. House of Representatives if she wins over Anthony Pappas in the general election on November 6.

Ocasio-Cortez calls herself a ‘Democratic Socialist’, a term she intends to represent the idea that ‘In a modern, moral and wealthy America, where we have the capacity to ensure that every American can have healthcare, education, and access to dignified housing, we should be able to try to do that as a society by whichever means we can.’ Not surprisingly, she worked as an organizer for Bernie Sanders during his campaign for Presidential Election in 2016, and was congratulated by him after her victory:

Bernie Sanders, however, refused to participate in her and the other Democrats’ campaign to abolish ICE. When asked in an interview on CNN about whether or not he also wants to abolish it, instead of giving a yes-or-no answer, he told Jake Tapper that ‘we need policies that deal with immigration in a rational way,’ which excluded ‘locking up children in detention camps or separating them from their mothers.’ He also called for Trump to sit down with Congress to talk seriously about how to develop these rational policies. Many Democrats have since turned on Sanders for taking this unclear position on ICE, saying he’s on the ‘wrong side of history,’ ‘now a pragmatic centrist Democrat’ and a ‘neoliberal shill.’

High-ranking Democratic officials who have echoed Ocasio-Cortez in this matter include New York Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio and Democratic Representative of Wisconsin Mark Pocan. As the first sitting senator to take this position, Gillibrand said that ICE had become a deportation force, and needed to be ‘reimagined’, as the agency today isn’t working as intended. De Blasio continued the call, asserting ‘You need some kind of agency to deal with immigration, but ICE is not that. ICE has proven it can’t be that. ICE’s time has come and gone. It is broken, it has been sent on a very negative, divisive mission, and it cannot function the way it is.’ Pocan is already working on drafting a bill that would suggest getting rid of the agency.

So, how did the agency originate? According to an account by Time, it was created as one of nearly two dozen agencies created following the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security under George W. Bush in 2003, as a counter-measure to the horrors of the 9/11 attacks in 2011. Cornell University history professor María Cristina García explains that the change from the issue of immigration going through the Department of Commerce and then the Department of Labor, to the new Department of Homeland Security, ‘reveals a great shift in how a society views immigration.’ Olivia B. Waxman of Time elaborates on the idea, saying that ‘If immigration is an economic or work-force issue, it would make sense to place it under the oversight of departments that deal with those issues. Placing immigration in the national security sector, however, reveals a changed focus on the idea of potential safety threats represented by immigrants, asylum seekers, and refugees.’ García says, however, though the link between immigration and national security grew exponentially after 9/11, that’s not where the link originated. It really started after the first World Trade Center bombing on February 26, 1993, and that Congress passed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act (IIRAIRA) under Clinton in 1996, reducing immigration from Latin-American countries. García thinks the calls for the abolition of ICE is linked to many of the new agencies under the DHS having conflicting responsibilities. She elaborates, saying ‘You have, on the one hand, an agency entrusted with preventing another terrorist attack, then you have agencies that deal with refugees and that requires a humanitarian [approach]. Refugee advocates, in particular, doubt that the U.S. can honor its humanitarian obligations if the inclination is to automatically assume that refugees and asylum seekers are potential terrorists.’

The calls for the abolition of ICE, has, however, received plenty of criticism from Republicans, most notably by Trump himself, tweeting on Saturday:

As to what the American people generally think, the latest Harvard/Harry poll (n:1448) sought to find out on June 24-25. They discovered that 69% of the American people opposed disbanding the agency, which included 59% of Democrats and 78% of Republicans. However, there’s actually a significant difference between the statistics of the Democratic base of the political party than the Liberal base of the political ideology, it turns out. Only 47% of liberals questioned in the poll opposed abolishing the agency. Though there were over 150 more Democrats questioned than Liberals, this indicates that moderates both Democrats and Republicans mostly (71%) reject the proposition of abolishing the agency. Another poller, Mark Penn, who served as chief strategist for Hillary Clinton in her 2008 presidential campaign, reported on Thursday that 84% of Americans questioned responded that they thought to notify ICE and overturning illegal immigrants to federal authorities would decrease crime rather than increase crime.

Pocan will likely not get very far with his bill, no matter how well he manages to write it, as he will meet strong opposition by both Republicans and moderate Democrats in Congress when it’s ready to be presented. Additionally, the majority of Americans, as shown above, also reject the idea of disbanding the 15-year-old agency, and consider its responsibilities and work for national security to be important and valuable for the American people. These polls may indicate that this is just another issue that a minority attempts to be the loudest about, and through that affect real change in American politics. They’ve gotten some strong proponents on their side in Congress, but they’ve still got a long way to go if they’ll ultimately manage to disband the agency.