The perpetrator in question is a Hispanic illegal alien from Guatemala(unsurprisingly), to the sanctuary city prosecutors of Montgomery County, his freedom is worth more than the lives of two law enforcement officers.
Roberto Garza Palacios, a 28-year-old illegal alien, was given a light punishment, essentially a slap on the wrist for causing a car crash last December, which led to the deaths of FBI agent Carlos Wolff and Deputy State Fire Marshal Sander Cohen.
The decision comes after prosecutors in Montgomery County found there was not enough to charge Roberto Garza Palacios, with anything more than a traffic violation. Just like that, the illegal alien didn’t even have to appear in court, to add insult to the injury of the victims’ families, he was given a measly $280 fine. According to court statements attained by the Washington Post, through investigation concluded that the illegal alien’s killing of Cohen and Wolff did not constitute a “reckless disregard” for life. An illegal alien, by nature, is already a criminal for committing the crime of coming into the country illegally/overstaying his visa, yet he gets no punishment after killing two law enforcement officers. Even after ICE made contact with him during his detention three months earlier, they have not confirmed his deportation, with a hearing to happen as late as March next year, for his act of overstaying his work visa since 2009.
To make matters worse, Garza Palacios has had previous traffic and criminal convictions. Court records show he pleaded guilty to driving while impaired in 2015. He also served four months in jail around the same time for smashing several cars and setting a fire. We can only wonder how someone who has the felony of arson and vandalism can somehow avoid getting deported and not even have his driving license suspended, is it because he is brown? Surely a white man couldn’t get away with a similar crime.
From a statement obtained by Wtop News, Marla Wolff, the widow of the FBI agent killed, said the months since the death of her husband have been filled with pain for her family, including the couple’s two young children.
“My kids don’t have their father anymore. Father’s Day was so hard,” Wolff cried.
The family spent the past Father’s Day at Carlos’ grave site, something Wolff called the family’s “new reality.”
As they heal, Wolff said she plans to turn her attention to pushing lawmakers to tighten laws which could result in tougher penalties in cases such as Garza Palacios in the future.
“We don’t want anyone else to go through these horrific losses,” Wolff said
The persecution of white farmers has been an ongoing issue in South Africa for years, very little coverage of it has been done by the mainstream, as it doesn’t suit their agenda to show that white people can also be victims of ethnic hatred. Unfortunately, like many have already predicted, things are taking a turn for the worse. Radical new actions sanctioned by the South African government is targeting white farmers, indicating to “confiscate” their land by force. The South African economy and the nation’s food production could collapse if the government seizes land from white farmers and redistributes it to black citizens, a local race relations organization has revealed. The move is approved by the African National Congress (ANC), the party that’s been ruling the country since the end of apartheid, under which amounted to ethnic tensions between black and white south Africans increased rapidly. The inception of this new policy started earlier this year, and is aimed at redistribution of wealth and “radical economic transformation.” The government is reportedly planning to put an end to what they call the legacy of apartheid, where nearly 95 percent of the South African wealth was kept in the hands of 10 percent of its white population. The apartheid regime had many drawbacks and may even be perceived as pure evil by some. However, if history has told us anything, it’s clear as day that radical socialist programmes aimed to achieve “equality” in a short span of time always end up in failure. It’s usually the individuals who proposed such policies in the first place that become the greatest benefactors of it. In this case, the impending doom may not be irreversible just yet, as local experts and organizations are starting to generate attention to alert the international community. Any further actions directed at the white farmer community from the government could result in a full-blown ethnic conflict or civil war, as the official stance of the ANC harbors and even encourages criminal elements to attack, murder, mutilate whites in the country. Racial hate-attacks against white farmers have been on the increase, some are gearing up to defend themselves in the upcoming race war:
Some analysts insist the ANC plan to redistribute land will jeopardize commercial farming in the region, with South Africa at risk of repeating the mistake made by another African country at the turn of the millennium. Zimbabwe’s food production dropped after the country’s government authorized the purge of white farmers in 1999-2000. The Institute of Race Relations has urged the international community to step in, as the South African government denies that the land expropriation, and the violence the bill allegedly sparked, are a problem.
By Nikos Tsinakis The media continues to step over the bodies of the shooting victims to attack their political enemies in a rush to judgment, placing false accusations, completely validating once again, that Trump was right. They are the lying press. The news of Thursday’’s shooting attack in Maryland, resulting in five deaths, was quickly repurposed into a political tool against President Trump by the media before any reliable details were released. A repeat of the despicable tactics from the mainstream media to tie-in all shooting attacks, most of the time from disgruntled individuals, leading the public to believe, immediately after it happened, that it somehow has to do with Trump.
Police said a man with a grudge against the local paper had opened fire using a shotgun in a “targeted attack” which killed four journalists and a sales assistant.
Jarrod Ramos, 38, lost a defamation lawsuit against the paper (Capital Gazette newspaper) in 2012 after it reported his campaign of harassment against a woman he went to school with.
The statement Trump made, which has since come under heavy fire by the globalist funded mass media, came from a tweet he made dating back to February 2017 (The tweet is still up as of this post) “The FAKE NEWS media (failing@nytimes,@NBCNews,@ABC,@CBS,@CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People!”
From the Independent
The lying press continues to lie
The bodies of the victims are not even cold and they’re trying to score political points by attacking Trump. Clearly, the journalists questioning him already have the answers that not even the police have, to even assemble the audacity to manipulate this event into a personalized attack on the President who just offered his thoughts and prayers to the victims’ family. What is there to talk about? It is now proven that this act was committed by a crazy lunatic non-white (hispanic) with a history of long dispute with the local newspaper. That’s all, literally nothing to do with Trump and his “white supremacist supporters”
Doesn’t look like the average “white” Trump supporter to me
This is an endless grasping of straws
Yes, the President doesn’t do himself any favors by always addressing his point in a straightforward way that opens himself up to being attacked, but it’s this very attitude of his that got him into the office in the first place. The American people need a Trump to voice their opinions for them in order to protest the tyranny of mainstream corporate media. Trump did nothing wrong in exposing the media as the enemy of the American people, and the very fact that they’re taking massive action to place the blame on him. The media owes the President an apology.
It’s not clearly indicated whether the BBC is having a slow news day or if the British mega news conglomerate decided to go full SJW across all topics they’re covering, might as well rebrand themselves as another Buzzfeed or Vice.
The lazy, under-researched social justice-preaching article cited zero evidence to back up their claims of institutionalized gender inequality. The best BBC could come up with happens to amount to no more than sharing retweets from Buzzfeed writers. Many of the Twitter complaints include news outlets still posting articles and pictures of attractive female fans of the sport, no doubt it’s “objectifying” women… Or how about men underestimating the female interest in the sport? It’s the current year of course, liberals want to tell you women are just as capable as men at all activities, including the knowledge of this fine sport. “Jokes mocking women football fans have been circulating, suggesting that they don’t really understand football and that they are watching the World Cup only to impress their boyfriends, to seek attention, or to check out handsome and muscular footballers.” This term shall be known as “muh women knowing stuff” Except, they don’t. Statistics clearly show women are nowhere near as interested in the sport of football compared to men, the numbers below is relative to BBC’s country of origin as it states British women only makes up for 7% of football-related video views on youtube, which indicates how few there are compared to the rest of the football demographic, which an overwhelming majority exceeding 50% belongs to men aged 18-24. Another incident these rampant third wave feminist twitter users have blown way out of proportions is the case of a Brazilian reporter who was “sexually harassed” on camera, while working, a football fan attempted to kiss her (without avail) on the cheek, before disappearing out of sight. Completely ignoring the intentions of the man, who obviously tried to prank on live television, the SJWs made this action out to be something that seems to happen all the time. Since when did this action of an individual proves football culture is sexist? How can one man represent all football fans present at the world cup? Leftists always say the actions of the individual don’t reflect upon the rest of the demographic when it comes to a minority or immigrant commits a crime, so why act all collectivist now?
A photo of First Lady Melania Trump’s jacket went viral last week and became a topic of heated discussion. The $40 jacket from the fast fashion retailer Zara somehow became the empirical evidence of Melania Trump being a “racist fascist Nazi” according to the leftwing media and anyone suggesting otherwise is also a Nazi.
The first lady flew out to McAllen, Texas, last Thursday morning to visit a shelter for illegal migrant children and had been separated from their detained parents. The jacket worn by her was adorned on the back with these texts: “I don’t really care, do u?” The Trump administration came under widespread criticism over the separations, which President Trump himself addressed as pre-existing laws already in place since the Obama era.
The subject matter quickly amounted to the mainstream media shutting down any and all alternative opinion besides their narrative of pinpointing everything on Melania to convince us she is a racist. The intentions behind such a censorship on people’s opinions goes beyond just an attempt to smear the First Lady but also to divert the actual message behind this jacket- She doesn’t care about the mainstream media. In doing so, the likes of CNN, CBS, BBC only exposed themselves, in their effort to fabricate and spread fake evidence to support this baseless claim in the first place. Void of any moral code, the leftist media, namely Snopes ; a “fact-checking” website with a history of liberal bias, helped to spread an inflammatory theory that linked Melania’s birthplace, a Slovenian city occupied by fascist Italy, a regime that dissolved decades before her birth as “evidence” of her being a full-blown racist/fascist/nazi. Conveniently, to avoid any legal backlash at such a serious accusation, the website labeled this theory as “unproven” declaring it as neither true or false.
“It’s a jacket. There was no hidden message,” Melania’s spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham said in a statement to the press. “After today’s important visit to Texas, I hope the media isn’t going to choose to focus on her wardrobe. (Much like her high heels last year).”
Eugene Gu – a doctor who recently sued trump over blocking him on twitter, posted a tweet likening Melania to Marie Antoinette, the tweet has since garnered more than 5000 likes: “Thought this was photoshopped but no, this is real. While visiting children thrown into internment camps, Melania Trump actually wore a jacket saying, “I don’t really care, do U?” That’s like Marie Antoinette ripping a piece of bread from a starving baby and spitting on it.”
The establishment media complex has never stopped character attacks on Trump’s family ever since he announced his election run, anyone with an ounce of intelligence ought to be extremely skeptical of such weaponized gossip material being marketed as “news”.
Italy’s Matteo Salvini is under attack by the mainstream media once again for his anti-mass migration/refugee stance. The defacto Prime Minister of this major EU country finds himself landing in trouble with media again after making a public comment that has always been consistently aligned with his campaign: “Europe must defend its borders against migrants arriving from Africa” He made the comment in a context to exert pressure on the European Union, pointing out that Italy may reconsider its financial commitment to the EU if not more was done to help Italy deal with the current migrant crisis. This man just can’t seem to catch a break. Being labeled as “far right” simply to continue delivering on his promise to the majority of Italian people that voted for him in the first place.
The face of optimism from the Italian Trump.
“The aim is to protect the external border, not to share the problem among European countries but to solve the problem at the source,” Salvini said. “If anyone in the EU thinks Italy should keep being a landing point and refugee camp, they have misunderstood.”
As a former radio show host, Salvini is no stranger to media sensationalism, has been under constant attack by the pro-EU mainstream media ever since the political coalition that his party is a part of came into power earlier this year, making him essentially the de-facto PM. Salvini wasted no time in using his public voice to attack the NGOs orchestrating the mass African migration into Europe, calling them out as “Human traffickers and Do-gooders” Making it as clear as ever that globalist human rights groups have no business in making Italy a landing group for unlimited amounts of African “migrants.” This confronting move taken by Salvini gained approval from Luigi Di Maio, his major coalition partner from the anti-establishment Five-Star Movement, who agrees with the upcoming permanent change in the Italian policy towards people arriving by boats from the other side of the Mediterranean. Di Maio added: “We save the migrants with our navy, with our coastguard, but the NGOs [should] go elsewhere,” Di Maio said. In a stance that’s deemed hardline by leftists, Salvini suggested the country would take its own drastic measures should the EU continue to do nothing during this crisis situation. Emphasising the mass migration problem must be solved at its roots in Africa instead of multiple European countries bordering the Mediterranean sharing the same problem and the same stance of inaction. The issue is expected to be discussed by Salvini, Di Maio and Giuseppe Conte, the Italian prime minister, at a meeting on Wednesday. Salvini, who is traveling to Libya in the coming days, said Italy was preparing a proposal that would strengthen the EU border and curtain migration but did not provide further details. ‘The air in Europe is changing and we are optimistic.’
The European Parliament Committee on Legal Affairs just voted ‘yes’ on highly controversial segments of the EU’s new Copyright Reform laws, a topic that’s been hotly debated in the past week. The controversial articles — 11 and 13 — effectively establish web link tax, censorship machines, and a ban on memes. This is a brazen assault on the freedom of speech for continental Europeans, masked in a format of protecting “copyrighted content” a direct attack against the right-wing opposition voice on the internet that has been successfully implementing the use of memes for the past several years.
The Anti-European hivemind at work
There was an incredible amount of resistance to the contested articles from internet activists, technocrats, and members of European Parliament (MEPs), but all the appeals were rendered to no avail and the articles passed with a 13:12 and 15:10 majority.
Article 11 forces all usage with portions of online journalistic content be required to obtain a license from the original publisher first. Possibly even affecting the act of hyperlinking articles, causing significant drops in audience reach of news posts. A quick summary of the article 13 include demands made to “internet society service providers” such as Facebook, Twitter, Reddit and Google to utilize content recognition tools to “prevent the availability” of copyrighted content from appearing online in the form of plagiarism and other forms of copyright violations. After a planned debate between the EU politicians today, both articles had its legitimacy acknowledged and endorsed by the European Union, much to the displeasure of all free thinkers around the world. If these laws come to affect, it would render all internet meme remixers out of their existence, the meme is a very powerful medium often directed at communicating complex political concepts at younger people. The Creative Commons official twitter page fired back at EU’s decision to adopt article 11 and article 13, calling it: “ – a dark day for the open web, but the fight will continue in the upcoming plenary vote in the European Parliament. #SaveYourInternet #SaveTheLink #FixCopyright”
Contact European Parliment members to voice your protest via this petition here
But we love our memes, right Mr Salvini?
Don’t lose hope just yet. The European Parliament Committees’ decision today does not immediately put this copyright reform into action in the legal form, however. The controversial article laws would be effective in further solidifying the EU’s stance on the distribution of copyrighted content around the globe, holding massive sway in potential future actions addressing this issue. “Article 13 has been adopted by European Parliament legal committee with a 15:10 majority. Again: We will take this fight to plenary and still hope to #SaveYourInternet” – Julia Reda, MEP for the European Pirate Party called for continuous resistance after the articles were passed. The people of Europe won’t give up their freedom to expressive themselves on the internet without a fight. The gun is on the table.
Four Human Rights groups have filed a complaint to the Ukrainian government for alleged attacks against minorities by nationalists during patriotic marches earlier this year. However, the historical motives of these Human Rights groups should make one feel at least a little skeptical about their claims. The joint complaint was filed by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Front Line Defenders, and Freedom House. The first two organisations named have been heavily involved in the refugee crisis in Europe for the recent years, with Amnesty International known for its “double the quota” campaign in the past, demanding western countries to accept more than a reasonable amount of refugees from the middle east and Africa, all the while when statistics clearly show even the existing asylum seekers in Europe fails to integrate at any significant rate, as well as contributing to the rise in crime and terrorism. “The law enforcement authorities have rarely launched investigations into the threats and attacks committed by these groups. In the cases where investigations were launched, there is no indication that effective investigative measures were undertaken, and perpetrators were identified, despite attackers publicly claiming, in some cases, responsibility for the attacks on social media.”
The joint letter points to a number of incidents in which “radical groups” were able to carry out unlawful acts with impunity. On March 8, participants of the Women’s March in Kiev were assaulted by right-wing groups as police “merely observed the attacks and took no steps to stop them or detain them.” It is unclear how this attack is linked to hate mongering against minorities by organized far-right fascists, when it’s entirely possible that the conflicts happened that day was due to a clash of individual citizens who seek to protect the country’s Christian identity from this Women’s March that’s fundamentally feminist/ cultural marxist in nature
The letter continues; “Ukrainian officials must meet their obligations to guarantee the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and expression, and the right to safety and security to all people in Ukraine,”
The attack claims in the letter also cited several more incidents since the beginning of 2018 where members of “right-wing radical groups” allegedly carried out two dozen attacks in Kiev and cities across Ukraine, the letter says. The nationalist group Right Sector was among those being named dropped in the letter, it is one of the currently most recognized right-wing groups in Ukraine after a surge of popularity during the outbreak of the War in Donbass in 2014. Many of the Nationalist groups in Ukraine formed their own paramilitary militias and fought in the war upon request from the Ukrainian government due to a shortage for manpower at the time. Previous Marches similar to the one incited in the letter were organized in the purpose of commemorating the patriots who put their lives on the line to defend their country, and their traditional Orthodox Christian values.
President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines issued a statement earlier this week to confirm he is currently considering giving out state-issued military quality firearms to ‘clean’ community leaders in order to further ramp up the ongoing war on drugs in his country. Rodrigo Duterte was elected president back in June 2016, promising to eradicate the illegal drug trade in the country, plagued by the shabu – local slang term for methamphetamine. In a span of nearly 2 years since his inauguration, the war on drugs has taken the lives of more than 4000 people, the vast majority of which are serial offending drug dealers. Human rights groups never ceased filing complaints and claim the actual numbers of people killed are at least triple the official data. The community leaders, also known locally as “Barangay Captains” will be the recipients of the firearms under this decision announced on Wednesday. The Philippines’ barangay communities vary in size and may be described roughly as districts or neighborhoods. To expand on the comparison of these communities are similar to neighborhoods, it’s important to point out these leaders are appointed democratically but usually come from families that have traditionally been in a leading position among these communities. It’s likely that most Barangay Captains already have firearms due to the relatively relaxed gun laws in the Philippines, as well as citizens, in general, have been encouraged to acquire guns on their own to ‘hunt’ down drug dealers for bounties. However, these new state-issued firearms could be a game-changer in the war on drugs due to superior quality and reliability, but mostly, it serves as a clear indication that the killing of drug dealers are sanctioned by the state. The main condition to acquire a gun for barangay captains is to be willing to fight crime and to not be engaged in illicit activities themselves. The said guns will be provided free-of-charge or the state will subsidize a private purchase of a captain’s gun of choice.
“The condition is that the captain should fight drugs and crime. If he is conniving with criminals, he could be the one shot,” the interior department undersecretary Martin Dino, who oversees the country’s barangays, told Reuters.
Globalist Human Rights groups including the UN Human Rights Watch, have been infuriated by Duterte’s administration ever since the inception of war on drugs, leading to a probe that investigated alleged extrajudicial killings. The Philippines government soundly brushed off all of the accusations from the UN and Duterte’s popularity has grown exponentially in both his country and overseas as a result of it. The United States could borrow some aspirations from this South East Asian country as America currently experiences a never before seen opioid crisis among its youth. American patriots already have the guns, it’s now up to POTUS to give the go ahead.
A humanitarian NGO ship carrying more than 630 refugees is being told by Italian authorities to reverse its course and “stay put” in the mediterranean sea. The ship being asked to turn around is MV Aquarius, operated by Doctors without Borders, a French globalist humanitarian organization also known as MSF. As of Monday the ship holding its position 27 nautical miles from Malta and 35 nautical miles from Italy, after the new Italian populist coalition government refused it docking rights on its territory. This is a show of force from the new Italian interior minister and the head of right-wing Northern League party Matteo Salvini, delivering his promise made earlier last week during his trip to Sicily. As well as reaffirming the fact that Italy will no longer accept refugees ferried in by nongovernmental organizations with a shady track record of collaborating with human traffickers. “From now also Italy begins to say NO to the traffic of human beings, NO to the business of illegal immigration,” said Salvini. Italy proceeded to ask Malta, a fellow EU member state to host and disembark the refugees in their territory. Malta quickly rejected this proposal, potentially opening a diplomatic rift between the two EU nations, a friction force that Italy can afford since the new right wing government has expressed an openly anti-European Union stance.
UPDATE: The #Aquarius has now received instructions from the Italian Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre to standby in our current position which is 35 nautical miles from #Italy and 27 nautical miles from #Malta.
According to the twitter page of “Doctors without Borders,” the ship being asked to be turned around is carrying 123 unaccompanied minors and 7 pregnant women. The humanitarian group also attacked the Italian government on Sunday for “Placing politics above people’s lives.” “The priority must be the importance of the well being [and] safety of the people on board,” it said. The UN refugee agency also chimed in on this matter, advocating for politicians to help solve this matter on an urgent basis; “States and actors involved should rapidly find solutions to allow migrants and refugees on board the [Aquarius] to disembark safely and quickly,” it said in a tweet. Further stressing in another tweet that the focus should be docking and disembarking the refugees while dealing with “wider issues” later, again completely ignoring the national sovereignty of Italy as a whole. The globalist United Nations clearly supports the rapid population replacement scheme to inflict pain and suffering on white European. Why else would they advocate for the continuation of sub-Saharan African countries to flood Europe through Sicily, at mass rates that’s statistically impossible to be hosted, settled and integrated quickly? As a note of reference, there are currently 170,000 asylum seekers already in refugee centers all around Italy.
The Austrian government announced earlier on Friday, that it’ll expel 60 imams and close down 7 mosques with funding traced back to Turkey. Although the Announcement came from Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, who has been targeted by left wing media ever since he won the Austrian election last year, this move simply has nothing to do with new policies enacted by his right-leaning government. This announcement is rooted in a 2015 law that forbids foreign funding of religious institutions. However, it is clear that Kurz does intend to uphold all pre-existing laws to the benefit of his country at maximum capacity, even if it means eventually evoking protest from the EU, no doubt, on the basis of “racism”. “Political Islam’s parallel societies and radicalizing tendencies have no place in our country,” said Kurz at a press conference. His vice chancellor, Heinz-Christian Strache, added ominously, “This is just the beginning.”
The turks as a collective, have more loyalty towards Erdogan than any European government they are living under
Turks have no place in Europe Forty of the Imams under investigation are apart of the “Turkish-Islamic union of social cooperation” an organisation funded by the Turkish government and helps with managing the Turkish mosques in the country, sounds dystopian enough? There are currently 600,000 muslims living in Austria, a country with only a population of 8.8 million, the vast majority of these muslims also happens to be Turkish. Turks at large, simply do not assimilate to the European countries they’re living in, we know this from the widely mobilized demonstrations in European cities in support of Recep Tayyip Erdogan during the Turkish elections. Erdogan’s government has been increasingly theocratically aligned after carrying out a purge in the Turkish government and military following a failed coup in 2016. The seven mosques in question, have been accused by the Austrian authorities after an investigation for practicing Salafism, an extremist brand of Islam. This is an alarming reflection on what potentially could be a large number of muslims in the country are also actively practicing extremist Islam. A case of radical Islam allying with social justice Turkish President Erdogan has condemned the move with immediate urgency, his spokesman Ibrahim Khalid decried the Austrian government’s decision on Twitter as “a reflection of the Islamophobic, racist and discriminatory wave in this country” and “an attempt to target Muslim communities for the sake of scoring cheap political points.” – Speaking of cheap political points, it’s kinda awfully ironic that this accusation is coming from the same person using the word “Islamophobia” to seek assistance from the western left by using these invented terms. News Flash: Islamophobia implies people are afraid of muslims, that’s not how this works, the bans exist because Islam is incompatible with the west.
If Islamophobia means not wanting Turkish state-funded extremist imams to radicalize a population over half a million, then count me in.
Confused and vulnerable children are being brainwashed by the UK government to become transgender. We are living in an engineered society by a state that lacks any morals and would do anything to preserve their power and gain profit, even if it means destroying all traditional values. There’s a direct correlation with propagating gender dysphoria and the left. An NHS boss said in a conference earlier this week that the UK must “be prepared” for more British citizens to question their gender in the coming years. He said that he believes up to three percent of the population will contact transgender health services in the future. Making such a ridiculous statement lacking in real facts only highlights the dark future our society is heading towards.
Two words: rainbow terrorism
James Palmer, the medical director for specialized services at NHS England, said at a conference on Monday that the expansion and improvement of NHS gender health services could cause demand to “accelerate”. It is implied that the earlier children and young adults are “coming forward to seek the expertise of hormone treatments” the better it is. It is highly possible that the state is using this to justify the expansion of their health budget to make the public more reliant on them, indeed it is a very nasty nightmarish plot. Palmer added that such an increase in using gender identity services was unprecedented, with no specialists ever seeing numbers ‘anyway near’
According to the latest estimates by the UK Institute of National statistics, there are currently 1.97 million people in the UK using gender identity service, with 1.6 million being in England (interesting….). Dr Polly Carmichael, the clinical director of the gender identity development service at the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust said the organization had experienced an “unprecedented” 100 percent increase in referrals between 2015 and 2016. Transgenderism and rapid decline in Testosterone The underlying issue is not young boys are “coming out” in droves and coming in terms with their mental disorder by pretending they are the opposite sex, the real problem is the decline in testosterone levels in the entire western world. This is such an obvious deleterious phenomenon being completely overlooked by the government powers responsible for looking after the wellbeing of the people. The last in-depth study conducted on this subject matter was made in 2007, it revealed a “substantial” drop in U.S. men’s testosterone levels since the 1980s, with average levels declining by about 1% per year. This means, for example, that a 60-year-old man in 2004 had testosterone levels 17% lower than those of a 60-year-old in 1987. Due to the lack of an updated version of this study for more than 10 years, we can only assume this trend continued with male testosterone decreasing even further. Grossly neglecting early signs of mental illness among children and lumping it in with a ‘natural’ increase in gender dysphoria does not correlate to valid evidence on the basis of science. Transgenderism is being advocated at an institutional level by the UK government to vulnerable underage children.
Residents of an elite liberal upmarket area in Paris city are complaining about “unwanted neighbors” as the city’s communist councilors seek to turn a public park into a refugee shelter. The new refugee shelter is planned to be built in the outskirts of Bois De Boulogne park, the second largest park in Paris, located next to the city’s elite 16th district, which currently hosts the French Open 2018 tennis tournament. The idea was presented a few years back by communist party councilors and has previously been rejected on grounds of the planned site would be too far away from any public transportation; Jean-Noël Aqua, a Communist adviser, said: “It would be nice if the whole territory, including the west of Paris, contributes to the effort of welcoming migrant people.”
The mayor of Paris- a socialist
Despite this plan has been placed on the drawing board since 2015, it is now finally coming to fruition, it is not a coincidence that the current refugee settlements in the city are expanding rapidly due to the increase in the “migrant” population, with as many as 550 refugees currently arriving in Paris each week. Such a high number of newly arrived Africans and Middle easterners settling in the city have created an interesting sight- refugee tent camps spiraling out of control. Last week, the Grande Paris Run was even canceled due to a major migrant camp had been established on the route the race was supposed to run through. It becomes obvious that the Mayor of Paris Anne Hidalgo herself must take actions towards land acquisition to ‘de-escalate’ the situation. Looks like the Mayor of Paris and socialist party member Anne Hidalgo is playing catch up with Sadiq Khan in a race to see who can destroy their formerly prosperous city first.
A vibrant display of diversity- tent city in Paris
The authorities in charge of the luxury district voiced their concerns about these new neighbors moving in, pointing out the possibility of these refugees not adhering to French values which would create conflicts with residents already living in the posh area. Funny enough, these concerns weren’t expressed when “migrants” were settled in other parts of France and Paris, no vocal protest was made until the safety of the elite is in jeopardy. Several interviews were conducted on the local residents by RT back in 2015, the residents showed mixed opinions as the old ones were concerned about the refugees not being able to integrate while the younger residents demonstrated to be more open and blindly accepting towards the idea. A younger girl said: “We should put ourselves in their perspective and see the challenges they face after escaping their war-torn countries.” Parisians voted a socialist Mayor in place, now they must face the consequences of frequent terrorist attacks and increase in general violent crimes correlating with the increase in third world migrants.
Italy’s brand new right wing interior minister takes a hardline stance on refugees, “pack your bags”- he says to the journalists as he travels down to the southern region of Sicily today. Matteo Salvini of the populist Lega party, freshly off the election victory, seeks to deliver the campaign promise he made to the Italian people by decreasing the number of refugees being accepted into the country and increase the number of expulsions. Port towns in Sicily are the epicenters of this “migrant” invasion not only into Italy but through bypassing the country, they have been making way to other EU nations (Germany, Sweden) after their initial landing thanks to globalist “humanitarian” efforts.
“The good times for illegals is over — get ready to pack your bags,” he said Saturday at a rally in Italy’s north.
“Countries need to start doing their job and no more smugglers should be docking in Italian ports.” – He directed this at the dozens of NGO organizations conducting search and rescues at sea, often complicit in aiding people smugglers.
An important battle must be won in Italy, to put a stop into this blatant population replacement the EU deep-state has been pushing upon Europeans. Merkel and the mainstream media in Europe has already been exposed countless times during the refugee crisis. Initially, the narrative being pushed was, poor and needy families fleeing the war turned out to be nothing more than opportunistic economic migrants that paid human traffickers for a ticket into the European welfare states. The vast majority of these refugees (more commonly by the mainstream media as “migrants”) are not even from the alleged war torn countries of Libya and Syria. Instead, it’s mostly military-aged men from sub saharan Africa and central asian Muslim countries like Afghanistan. These refugees just so happen to be more prone to commit violent crimes, rightfully making the citizens of Italy feel concerned about these new people in their neighborhoods, as there is no possible way to perform background checks on them. One of the more extreme examples of migrant crime happened earlier this year when a teenage Italian girl was chopped up into pieces by a Nigerian refugee.
Migrant rescue NGOs are nothing more than just a glorified taxi service
The latest one of these humanitarian boats arrived in Sicily on Friday, carrying more than 150 people, just hours after Salvini sworn in as the minister. It must be made clear that such cases are happening in very high volumes reaching incredibly absurd numbers- a total of 700,000 refugees have arrived in Italy this way since 2013, currently, 170,000 are in asylums centers, wasting away billions of taxpayers’ money annually. Only 6500 deportations were made last year.
For those unaware of what humanitarian intervention is, in addition to how it works, this opinion piece will give you an insight into what it is, how it works, and where it is possibly going wrong on the global stage.
Humanitarian intervention is when a state essentially uses legitimate force against another state that has committed a gross offence against its own people. This use of force is usually legitimised by the United Nations Security Council, a chamber of delegates selected and appointed by the government they represent. For example, the British representative on the USMC is Karen Pierce CBE. This point of this council is to seek evidence, determine a motive, review the actions of the country at question and determine how they should act in order for the country in question to receive retribution for its mistake. The UN sees this as their moral obligation and the whole project gravitates around several liberal moral principles that formulate is nature.
Now we know the minimal basics of what the UNSC is and how it works, we can now go on to accessing whether it is a force for good or a force for evil, for itself, other nations, and world peace as a whole. What must be taken in to account is the nature and texture of states. Thomas Hobbes, a great British philosopher declared that humans live in a constant state of nature. It is this state of nature that causes them to act within their own self-interest, the Athenian general Thucydides reached the same conclusion when he wrote about his observations of the Peloponnesian war thousands of years prior to Hobbes. This state of nature can be inflated from the scale of human beings, all the way up to the size of states, by doing this we draw the conclusion that even within a liberalised institution like the UN, states will always act or seek to influence other states to take the side of their national interest.
Gaddafi giving a speech to the UN in 2009. Libya has descended into chaos and anarchy ever since his regime got overthrown.
Despite the moral obligation to intervene, there are several more interests that states have when they choose to initiate an engagement with “the bad guy”. There is usually an “interest” at the bottom of the humanitarian intervention barrel. National, regional, economic, security interests all govern the decisions of politicians. That’s before the influence of eager-eyed suited and booted lobbyists paid by some of the world’s greatest and most powerful corporations.
By now you should be starting to see a pattern emerge, the fact is that there is more than meets the eye to the decisions of nations on the UNSC when it comes to the final decision on whether a country should face a legitimised use of force. The issue with this and all of these interests is that the countries that are prepared to engage in the humanitarian intervention to reap the rewards will all look for the justification that they want to engage in this intervention… this is because it will be beneficial to the interests we’ve just discussed, in addition, it will weaken the opposing state.
Now it wasn’t long ago that airstrikes were carried out against the esteemed president Muammar Gaddafi, this was a notion that was said to be justified for the united states due to supposed appalling human rights records. Yet years later the general public found out that the ever-expanding US required regime change, primarily due to Gaddhafi’s plans to redistribute western wealth through a new currency scheme, in addition to many other positive pro Libyan/Pan-Arabic changes. Therefore liberal morality was used to pull at the heartstrings of the public in absence of absolute evidence. Ironically Gaddafi had recently torn up a UN charter and claimed the UNSC to be illegitimate due to the massive flaws within its operating system. Furthermore, Gaddafi had never been in much control of his nation due to his system of devolution of which gave local committees ultimate power, a policy from his own creation, the green book ideology. The old lion often complained that western journalists didn’t understand that he was not at the helms of the controls and took up a far more ceremonial position as the bringer of the revolution. Yet the UNSC saw fit to hold him accountable for the ill evidenced moral crime of terrible human rights records, claiming to be “bringing democracy” to a country that ultimately couldn’t be any more democratic if it tried.
All of this talk of national interests, ulterior motives and well evidence past cases should bring about issues with regards to the recent chemical weapons attacks in Syria, for the council voted for an intervention on the basis of “evidence” from a western-backed group, of which is commanded by an ex British military officer. When the OPCW reached the “scene” of the “attack” there was no sign of chemical weapons usage, yet there was a boy who claimed the video being used as evidence was staged, as he was in it. This should be showing those that think critically that the UNSC is simply a tool of exploitation, a tool that preaches morality through liberal values, yet is heavily misused to benefit the powers at be. This and its links to inaccurate reporting from mainstream outlets shows the sheer size of the agenda held by the UN and its allies, an agenda that isn’t likely to change soon. Since the media form public opinion and none of them reported accurately about Syria, it seems that the UNSC and its allies have friends in high places.
Therefore if I am to draw a conclusion on the UNSC, I would state that due to the nature of it, it is a grossly misused tool of which has had some successes, yet has stumbled and fallen into the lap of serving finance through the advent of liberal morality. It often uses the smallest scraps of evidence to enact it’s sanctions and chase its motives. I, therefore, believe that if the UNSC is to continue its work, it should be on a basis of votes from all delegates from every nation, the idea of main powers vetoing must be dismissed, and thorough and substantial evidence must be gained and presented to the public before the legitimized use of force is taken. It has never been more important to question everything.
Italy’s government change remains as an ongoing process following the good news earlier this week when Giuseppe Conte was given the mandate to become the prime minister of a coalition composed by only populist parties. It now seems like anti-Globalist patriots around the world have held celebrations too early.
In an unexpected turn of events, Italian president Sergio Mattarella( elected in 2015) interferes with the will of the people as he treacherously rejects the new Finance Minister appointed by winning political coalition that held more than 60% of the votes. His reasoning for rejecting the proposal involves his personal ‘bottom line’ of not risking an exit from the European Union/eurozone. Mattarella’s action clearly goes against the will of Italy’s public majority, a majority that’s fed up with the Tyranny of the European Union as they voted for the two populist parties: Lega Nord(held the most votes out of any party) and the anti-establishment Five-Star Movement.
Italy’s Prime Minister-designate Giuseppe Conte speaks to the media after a meeting with the Italian President Sergio Mattarella at the Quirinal Palace in Rome
Five Star Movement (M5S) was outraged with Mattarella’s decision as the M5S leader Luigi Di Maio calls it “an institutional clash without precedent” in a live video streamed from his facebook page.
Italy’s PM-designate Giuseppe Conte said he’s given up on attempts to form a government after President Sergio Mattarella rejected his candidacy for economy minister. The country may now face a new election by the end of 2018.
Conte confirmed his failure to form “the government of change” in Italy, saying: “I can assure you that I did my utmost to try to fulfill this task.”
Mattarella told the media that he “agreed to all the ministers except the finance minister” proposed by the coalition. “I asked for a figure, who would mean not risking an exit from the euro,” he explained.
Such a brazen display from the acting Italian President to protect the interests of the EU is an insult to all europeans that believe in Democratic values and certainly a testament to the volatility within the Italian constitution. The elected President and Prime Minister having different motivations as well as opposing views will only stop the will of the people from being carried out. Incoming ultimatum Extremely upset coalition supporters are demanding the President’s impeachment and an immediate replacement. However, it seems like the leader of Lega Nord party don’t want to talk about impeachment just yet. “We need to keep cool. Some things cannot be done in the throes of anger… I don’t want to talk about impeachment,” Salvini said speaking in a radio interview with Radio Capital. Leader of the Lega Nord Matteo Salvinialso expressed interest in the alternative to work within the system by communicating with the Five Star party to change electoral laws. Time will soon tell whether or not Salvini optimism has paid off. If not, the adopting the hardline stance to advocate for impeachment will surely be the next most effective option.
