According to Caleb Luna, a self described queer, fat, brown, femme, writer, dancer(?) and organiser : “falling in love is dangerous for brown boys because, under white supremacy we are not people to love.” Yes, he actually wrote that. In a blog written for a liberal website BGD he further elaborated that “ Colonization indoctrinates us into romantic idolization of thinness, whiteness and masculinity”. That’s right. He begins to blame good old imperialism and colonialism for his present predicament which he describes himself as “ugly and unloveable”
He then goes on to ask “ How do I, as a fat, brown, femme, decolonize my desire so I can desire myself?. How do I decolonize my desire so I won’t ever again compulsively glance at a skinny boy who refuse to see me as the Goddess I am?”.A Goddess. He actually expects some skinny fellow to look at him like a “ Goddess” while falling head over heels in love with him. And if he doesn’t, then: WHITE SUPREMACY!
He declares that the world is cruel to him because he is fat. He writes “ I have been denied job opportunities because of my body. I do not fit into restaurant booths, airplane seats or, school desks comfortably- which serves as constant reminder that this world was not built to accommodate me”. See how he blames the entire world for his own fatness rather than his laziness or eating habits. Liberalism 101. According to him desiring a thin person is a “ subtle investment in white supremacy and class privilege.”
After a few paragraphs attacking men, whites, thin people and blaming dating apps, beards and other fat people, he starts opening up about what he really hates: Love. Just read what he writes about love and romance : “ Romantic Love as we understand it is a colonial construct. It is an all consuming, possessive, lifelong, monogamous endeavour that works to sustain capitalism and white supremacist heteropatriarchy via the nuclear family. It is a perpetual and intimate exposure to the interlocking systems of white supremacy, fat hatred, cissexism and more.” Surprise! Having a family and loving them is white supremacy too! It is insanely idiotic for this writer to miss the fact that not just whites but, almost all ethnicities all over the world including Asians, Africans, Latino Americans and Polynesians thrive as families where people care for each other. Family is not a white or a capitalist thing. But Mr. Caleb Luna in his hatred for white people has seemed to miss that.
The entire article is filled with other such deliciously stupid paragraphs that blame several others things. But this article provides us with an useful insight into the mind of the Obama era liberal, taught all the basics in public schools, further indoctrinated through TV, music and movies. Brought up on a steady diet of hate and a constant feeling of oppression and victimisation. Remember, these are the kind of the people that the democratic party base is filled with. These are the people behind the #Resistance and Antifa. These are the people unhinged bythe victory of Trump and are now doubling down on their insanity.
Finally my personal advice to Caleb Luna: instead of blaming the universe and beards for your predicament of “ Ugly and Unloveable” try this – Lose a hundred pounds, Get rid of the nose ring, stop writing stupid blogs, get a good job, get rid of that silly hairstyle and most importantly: You’re a man. So start acting like one.
Two rallies took place this weekend in London, one had Tommy Robinson and the other had Socialism.
What has been reported as ‘thousands of people’ (but what only looks like a hundred at most) have been seen marching through Oxford Circus in London on Saturday protesting racism and Islamophobia from the Far Right. The protesters held banners that said that they wanted open borders and that no human is illegal, calling for all refugees to be brought into the UK without any filter.
A report by far left Muslim media outlet, Aljazeera, states that political figures like Conservative MP Jacob Rees Mogg, Nigel Farage and the leaders of Britain First are all far right racists. They also decided to call Nationalism a ‘far right’ belief. None of this is true. None of the above believe that Hitler was a good leader, none are racist (Islam is not a race) and none of them identify as Nazis. This is the meaning of Far Right:
The term is often associated with Nazism, neo-Nazism, fascism, neo-fascism and other ideologies or organisations that feature extreme nationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, racist or reactionary views. These can lead to oppression and violence against groups of people based on their supposed inferiority, or their perceived threat to the nation, state or ultraconservative traditional social institutions.
Abraham Khoudari, an 18 year old Syrian, said at the march: “There is racism in the UK, it is just more hidden because it’s so diverse and acts on a more subliminal level. But when it’s like that is even worse, Nationalists have come to the forefront, they are in parliament and in power. It means more people are becoming more confident about expressing their racist views. The result of that is hate crimes increasing so much. It’s just terrible and we are sick of it.”
Although racism from mainstream politicians has been mentioned a lot in the mainstream media, no examples were given of it.
On Sunday, thousands turned up for a Speakers’ Corner rally where right wing figures like Tommy Robinson, Martin Sellnar and Katie Hopkins turned up to speak up for freedom of speech. Martin Sellnar (a right winger who is a strong critic of Islam) gave a speech at the event. Katie Hopkins (according to her Twitter) got heckled and molested by muslim gangs.
Dear Friends, dear Britons, dear lovers of free speech.
I assume you all are lovers of free speech because you have come to Speakers’ Corner.
You might not understand all the fuss happening today around this speech. Honestly, I don’t understand it either.
My name is Martin Sellner. I am an Austrian patriot, and at the moment, I’m sitting in a detention cell in Colnbrook Bypass near Heathrow. My smartphone was taken and my girlfriend Brittany was separated from me. I currently don’t know where she is. We will be deported on Sunday.
Five minutes ago, they unlocked our cells and my fellow inmates are gathering in the prison wing. They are mostly illegals and eastern European criminals.
What brought me into this situation? What was my crime?
My crime was that I wanted to be here with you, to speak at Speakers’ Corner.
But let’s start with the beginning. I was invited by UKIP to present my movement at an event last Autumn. I represent Generation Identity — a patriotic European youth movement that is raising awareness about mass immigration and Islamisation.
Far-left people call us right-wing, people who want to shut free speech down call us ‘fascist’, and folks who hate their own culture call us ‘racist’.
In reality, we are just a group of young patriots fed up with the system, the mainstream press and lying politicians. We use peaceful activism to make our voices heard, and contrary to our friends on the radical left, who are probably swarming you right now, we never wear masks.
From Paris to Rome, from Vienna to London, we fight peacefully but without compromise for our freedom, our homelands, and our identity!
This is what I wanted to speak about in Autumn. But the conference was cancelled due to threats from the radical left. The venue would not take the risk. So they rescheduled it for March, this time keeping the venue secret — but again the terror of the left prevailed, and the venue dropped out.
But this time I did not want to let them win! It was about principles! (Also, our flights were already booked.)
My last refuge was Speakers’ Corner. I remembered my mother telling me about that special place when I was a child. It seemed almost magical to me. A place where everyone, without exception, could just stand on a box and start to speak to those who wanted to listen. I have always loved this tradition of Speakers’ Corner, which seemed very British to me.
But I came only to see that this tradition — the tradition of freedom of speech in the United Kingdom — is dead.
Your Country is blocking you from challenging ideas from the outside. This is a disgrace to our democracy!
I should be speaking in neat, warm a conference room right now, and you should be sitting in comfortable chairs. Instead, I’m in my cell and you are on the street in a standoff with the enemies of freedom of speech.
And this is very telling! Today there is a war going on for our freedom of speech. This war is being fought on the streets, by you!
Every man and woman showing her face today, standing shoulder to shoulder, is standing up against a new totalitarianism that has been growing for far too long. You can be proud of yourself. You might not even agree with me on every point — you are simply giving a statement that I should have the right to speak my mind freely.
I would love to be among you now. They prevented me from it. They locked up the speaker, but I know that the speech will find a way through the iron bars. It will find a way to you and you are going to hear what you government so desperately wants to protect you from.
Those words which they consider more harmful to you then rape gangs or terrorists who are let into your country again and again.
I’m going to tell you something nobody has told you before. It’s the biggest, most obvious secret of our media our politicians and our powerholders: People of Britain, you are being replaced.
There has always been immigration in your history. People coming in, assimilating. But what’s happening today is different: You are being replaced by massive Muslim immigration.
You see it everywhere: in London, in Manchester, but also already in the little countryside towns. A big replacement is going on.
And let me tell you: your politicians have no plan, no vision and no idea how to deal with the problems that come along. Problems like you have seen in Telford, Rotherham, and on Westminster Bridge.
All across Europe, there is a shadow hanging over our heads. The French are whispering about in the Metro, the Germans murmuring about it when they feel unwatched, Italians look left and right, and if nobody is listening they tell you: “I don’t feel at home anymore in my street. We are becoming foreigners in our own country.”
And again and again I hear: “We are not allowed to talk about it.”
And that’s the bizarre drama of the ‘Strange death of Europe’. We are being replaced, conquered by radical Islam, and we are now allowed to talk about it!
Dear Britons, defenders of free speech. Out of my cell in Colnbrook, I want to ask you something. Be honest and raise your hands.
Who among of you has ever been in the following situation: You grab a beer after work, or you are visiting your girlfriend’s parents for the first time, or you meet other children’s parents at school — and suddenly the conversation moves to politics: radical Islam, immigration.
Who of you in this very moment was faced with the decision between speaking his mind and facing problems, or complying and staying silent?
Raise your hands and be honest.
I will not be able to see the results, but every single hand is too much. This amount of fear should not exist in a society. Speech that has social costs and severe consequences is no longer free. It has a price — and our Government and the Antifa are working everyday to raise that price.
No freedom of speech means no democracy. In front of our very eyes this country is becoming a tyranny, shutting all debates about immigration down, until demographics solves the issue by replacement.
People of the UK. I might be in a cell right now, but you all are in a cell. It’s the prison of fear and silence your governement and the PC tyranny has locked you in since the days of your childhood.
I ask you, I command you, break free!
Patriots of the UK: come out of the closet. Make your dissent visible by visible acts of resistance that inspire others. I know for certain that millions in the UK think like me. Those millions should be on the street now.
We need a coming out of the silent majority, or Britain is lost. We need a free, open and honest debate about immigration, Islam and demographics, so we can sort these problems out together.
And I know that the force is still in you. With your Brexit vote you stunned the world! The will and the life of the British nation is not broken.
Initially, I asked if freedom of speech is dead in the UK. You, every one of you who came today, is a living sign that the tradition of the UK is not dead! You are the livley tradition of your nation, saving its face before history.
People of the UK — remember who you are! Remember your glorious past, you are sons and daughters of knights, kings, explorers, philosophers and artists. Who is the sovereign in this country?
Is it big money?
The mainstream media?
It’s you — the people. You, the silent and invisible majority who said NO during Brexit. You can say NO again — no to Islamisation, no to mass immigration, and no to the great replacement.
And YES to your identity — yes to your security, yes to your heritage and the future for your children.
And all this is impossible without to freedom of speech.
I know, if these words will find their way to the UK and even to Speakers’ Corner, it will be victory for our cause.
If they did, and if you are hearing them now, I tell you: go further on that winning street. Don’t be afraid because we have an ally that is unbeatable: Truth.
The battle, our battle for freedom of speech, has just begun, and Speakers’ Corner will become a symbolic place in that struggle.
When you go home know I want you to bring the spirit of Speakers’ Corner with you. Every single person who raised his hand because he could relate to this moment of fear, when he did not dare to speak his mind.
Promise me: Next time I will overcome my inner fear. Next time I will speak up!
Due to recent events, President Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr, is divorcing his wife of 13 years, Vanessa Trump. Trump Jr has conceded to the divorce and has agreed to pay Vanessa and allow her to have custody of the children. The couple have 5 children, ranging from ages 3-10 years old.
Trump Jr and his wife have been in the headlines a lot recently: Trump Jr being accused of collaborating with a Russian Lawyer (who Obama had several meetings with beforehand), Vanessa Trump getting hospitalised by dangerous white powder and Trump Jr being asked to give documents from Trump Tower over said collusion with Russia. However, these events are not said to be the reason Trump Jr is being divorced According to those close to the couple, they have been drifting apart for some time and a divorce wasn’t a question if – it was a question of when. Vanessa Trump states her reasoning for the divorce saying that she is unhappy about Trump Jr’s constant travelling, how little time they spend together as a couple and Trump Jr’s use of his social media.
Speaking of social media, many media outlets are now celebrating the divorce between Trump Jr and his wife.
If a media company wants to look trustworthy and non-partisan then maybe it’s a good idea to not mock a president’s son for getting a divorce, report the raw facts and leave the opinions to the viewer.
The Washington Press takes the opportunity to unnecessarily spread fake news over Trump Jr’s father’s administration ‘imploding’. Can somebody tell them that unemployment is at its lowest in the US in 17 years, 2.5 million jobs have been added since January 2017, the economy is booming and women in the workforce has reached an all time high – all thanks to President Trump’s ‘failing’ administration. We at Goldfire Media are all for being fair to both sides of the argument but we wont stand for outright lies. The mainstream media will always be known as…
On Thursday, the international community was given a big surprise. North Korean Dictator Kim Jong Un and U.S President Donald Trump were about to meet in the near future! This is a historic moment in both nation’s troubled history. Especially, in the present context, this development is rather shocking since it was preceded by many months of these leaders firing shots and verbal barbs at each other. Kim Jong Un upped the ante by conducting nuclear tests while Trump issued multiple sanctions on North Korea. Both nations seemed to be on the brink of war when, out of the blue this meeting was announced. While many sections of the media reacted differently to the announcement, there is no doubt that this is a clear victory for Trump. Let us look at the reasons why-
1.Kim Jong Un extended the invitation himself: This is one of the decisive factors. While both nations were in a rather ugly stalemate, Kim Jong Un backed down and offered the olive branch himself. He sent the proposal to meet Trump via a South Korean delegation and Trump accepted it. To get a very stubborn and arrogant dictator with a nuclear arsenal to extend the olive branch is no small feat. And Trump deserves most of the credit.
2. Kim Jong Un is scared: This is obvious for now. Kim Jong Un has been cowed down by a series of tweets. Trump first started targeting the dictator by calling him names like “Little rocket man” and then escalated the conflict with his already famous “fire and fury” and “much bigger button” tweets. While at the time, Kim Jung Un reacted aggressively by calling Trump a “dotard” and conducting unsanctioned nuclear tests, he slowly realised that this was war he could not win and Trump was someone he could not scare with his tactics. Coupled with South Korea and its other allies, the US imposed sanction after sanction on North Korea and drove Kim Jong Un to corner in which he was forced to mellow down. The Trump administration’s “Madman with a trigger” approach worked perfectly.
3. The Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula: This is a huge victory not just for Trump and the USA but for the entire international community. While it has not yet been denuclearized, the first step in the process has been lain. A week ago, even this seemed almost impossible. Kim Jong Un promised the end of nuclear testing, not just a temporary freeze according to Trump. Also the sanctions again North Korea remain for the present. For such a rogue administration to take such a backward step is almost unbelievable.
4. Trump Proved the Media and his critics wrong (again): Classic Trump. Since Trump first started targeting Kim Jong Un through twitter to his “fire and fury” tweets and other recent comments, the media and the Trump critics department were howling in derision. They called Trump’s approach “unpresidential”. They screamed that Trump was riling up Kim Jong Un and the USA would suffer the consequences. They called his method “dangerous” and “disastrous”. They claimed Trump was taking USA to the brink of war with North Korea. And then Surprise! Trump was proved right again. His approach worked. He proved the media and his critics wrong again like the countless times he has done since he started his campaign. Once again, the media and the critics were left with egg on their face and made feeble attempts to discredit the meeting and Trump.
The meeting between Trump and Kim Jong Un is expected to happen sometime before the end of May. Sarah Sanders had announced that the time and place are yet to be determined.
All in all, there is still a long way to go for lasting peace and the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. But, a foundation has been laid on which to build it. This is something no previous administration has done before and Trump has done it just as he has done many things in his Presidency: Unconventionally, and through the sheer force of his personality.
Feminists in the USseem to be reaching new record lows everyday. The level they stoop to express their hate is getting nastier and crazier everyday. They have become particularly unhinged after Donald Trump won the election against their beloved rape enabler Hillary Clinton. Imagine the amount to hate required to brainwash a child as young as 4 years old to hate a particular race and to hate the law just to advance their radical beliefs. This is exactly what these feminists did to their children.
Neesha Powell is a reporter for Everyday Feminism, a feminist website. She describes herself as Black, queer, feminist, womanist (?), dancer, organiser, freedom fighter (??) and writer among other things. In an article she published in January this year she describes Selena Valesco a “queer, non-binary, femme artist” from Seattlewho teaches her 8 year old son Elijah about Trump and his policies. Yes, to a 8 year old boy. She taught him about Trump’s temporary travel ban calling it an “immigration ban” and asking him to imagine what it would feel like if Trump ordered his grandparents from Mexico to leave the US and never come back.And she didn’t stop there. She even took her son to Black Lives Matter marches and even claims to have taught him how to spot “Anti-blackness” in the playground. And it gets worse. She also supposedly taught her son about America’s “White Supremacy”. She claims it is an attempt to “decolonize” his education.
Next Powell describes Shaun a black, queer, “non-binary parent” and his 4 year old daughter. She claims that this 4 year old “knows” what Trump is doing “isn’t right”. And her parents have already taught her that “Police are harmful”(good job teaching your child to hate law enforcement). And Shaun also claims to taught his daughter about the realities of this “ Anti-Black police state”. Even the stories they read to their daughter are infused with identity and gender politics. Shaun says that “ We ask what their pronouns are to be this time, we’ll change up relationships, just try to queer things up as much as we can”.
Both Valesco and Shaun have already taught their children about “gender fluidity”. They taught them that gender “exists” out of the binary and to ask for pronouns. They also taught them they have the “right to determine their own gender” irrespective of basic biology or logic. Powell end the article with her “hope” that “social justice” and “anti-oppression” are made required coursework in all schools. She claims this is necessary in a time when Donald Trump’s apparent racism and misogyny “ poison our youth and their futures”. She expressed her hope that these children would grow up to “lead this country out of the grips of bigotry and oppression”.
What these people need to realise is that these kind of identity politics which reduce people to their skin colour and gender have been rejected by the public. It actually caused the ordinary, average Americans to desert the Democratic party in droves. It actually caused many people to move towards Trump rather than away from him. If they keep on clinging to this kind of activism they will surely be decimated in the coming elections. Sadly, the most negatively effected by these are the children themselves.They are the victims of this radical liberal ideology which is forced upon them at such a young age by their unhinged parents. To sum it up, this doesn’t bode well for any of us and especially for them and their future growing up.
When the Academy Awards or Oscars as they are popularly known were presented on Sunday night Get out, won an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay. While it was nominated in other categories like Best Actor, Best Director and Best Picture, it faced stiff competition from movies like Christopher Nolan’s Dunkirk, Spielberg’s The Post, Guillermo del Toro’s The Shape of Water and The Darkest Hour among others. Ultimately, The Shape of Water won the Best Picture. While most people would agree that it was well deserved as usual, some liberals started propagating the idea that “Get Out” should have won and the only reason it lost was because of (Surprise!) : Racism and White people.
Delusional, scary old white people not understanding the relevance of a movie that skewers delusional, scary old white people is the most delusional, scary old white people thing that delusional, scary old white people have done today. #GetOut
Some of these gems took to twitter to express their outrage over this “injustice”. A user named “Jake”(@fpsnake) on Twitter blamed “delusional scary old white people” for this. Another user Imran Siddiquee went off against Gary Oldman for winning the Best Actor award over Daniel Kaluuya. He called Oldman an “accused abuser playing a white supremacist terrorist”. Ironically the character which Oldman played was that of Winston Churchill, the furious rival and one of the chief forces responsible for the fall of Adolf Hitler, the most notorious white supremacist of all time. Even more ironic or perhaps moronic is another user who called herself the “Wielder of Nazibreaker” ranting against Gary Oldman calling his performance “flatulent” and “blustering” just because he beat Daniel Kaluuya for the award. Another user called Harley O’Donnell claimed that Daniel Kaluuya was “robbed” of the award while “White boy Gary” got it for “Playing a racist”. There are many more examples like this.
Even some sections of the media took up this narrative. Esquire Magazine’s Sam Parker wrote an article which claims that Get out should have won the Oscar just so that it could give a signal to people that “change was underway in Hollywood”. Yes, according to him the awards should be not be given on technical, directorial or artistic merit but just to virtue signal to the public. He also criticised the Academy for being “76% percent male and 94% white until 2014”. USA today’s Andrea Mandell also wrote an article which slammed the Oscars for not being diverse enough.
What these people do not seem to realize is that they are asking for award based just on skin colour while also criticising others from winning just based on skin colour. Isn’t that what racism is? Aren’t they advocating for race supremacy? The very thing they claim to fight against, they are espousing.
Personally, I found it quite surprising that Get out even got so many nominations at all. When I first watched the film I found to be quite average, rather forgettable. Yes, it was a different concept but I felt it squandered its potential with lacklustre screenplay. The climax sequence was the only good part of the film. I felt all the glowing reviews the film got were because people were too afraid to criticise it for fear of being called a racist and that the film itself was overlooked against the message it delivers. This has been a recent trend in Hollywood in which critics give good reviews to average films just because they portray some liberal views.
All in all, even the Oscars this year couldn’t escape the liberal meltdown and outrage.
Jimmy Kimmel, the late night T.V show host has been one of the most watched comedians in recent years. His ‘I ate all your Halloween candy” segment was one of the best comedy segments in recent years. But, Especially since 2016 Jimmy Kimmel has taken upon it himself to become America’s moral conscience. He has used every opportunity to criticise, downplay, belittle and mock Trump and his presidency. He even used his own child’s illness as an opportunity to bash Trump and his stance on healthcare.
Don’t get me wrong. There is nothing wrong in criticising the president or his policies. It is one of the advantages of having a democracy. But shouldn’t criticism be fair and impersonal. Not so with Jimmy Kimmel. For example, in one of his episode he showed the audience a video clip of Trump getting onto Air Force One. In the clip as Trump climbs up the stairs, his hair gets disrupted by the wind and flaps about. Kimmel used this clip as if it was a comedy piece all sweetened with the fake laughter of his in-house audience. His crew even went on to record opinions from several hairstylists on what they thought about Trump’s hair! All this to turn something as mundane as hair flapping in the wind as a mockery of the President. Now, Imagine if someone gave the same treatment of Barrack Obama during his presidency. What if someone criticised Obama on his looks? Would they have got away so easy? Wouldn’t they have been hounded and called “racist” all over the mainstream media. Even Kimmel himself is no stranger to calling Obama critics ‘racists’, like in
From Trump’s inauguration to the recent Florida school shooting, Kimmel has used every opportunity to mock and criticise Trump. He even went on to record bytes from 3 to 5 year old kids and got them to mock Trump. Imagine any other comedian doing this to Obama. What would they have been called? Instead of being comedian Kimmel has become a Democratic mouthpiece whose jokes make liberals feel good about themselves and ease the pain of an election loss.
While being such a loudmouth on Trump, Jimmy Kimmel has been eerily silent on other issues. Where was Jimmy Kimmel’s moral conscience when Obama bombed more countries than George Bush? Where was it during the Fast and Furious scandal? Where was it when IRS targeted conservatives? Where was it when Obama used the NSA to spy on Americans? Where was it when the black unemployment reached the highest figures during Obama’s 8 years? Where was it during Hillary’s Email scandal? Benghazi? Was it sleeping when Obama colluded with Hezbollah to undermine his own country’s interest for Iran? Was it hiding under the stair when the Obama Administration lied to the American people about not giving any ransom while airlifting billions of dollars? Was it dead when Obama created an echo chamber in the press to cover up his failures and misdeeds?
While Kimmel has expressed outrage over Trump’s language in the leaked access Hollywood tape, he has remained suspiciously silent on the multitude of sexual harassment charges on Harvey Weinstein, his Hollywood buddy. While the entire nation expressed its disgust on Weinstein, Kimmel strictly avoided bringing up the subject. When he was finally cornered and asked his opinion, he sidestepped without answering. Doesn’t just this show his agenda? Doesn’t this make his bias glaringly obvious. Doesn’t this make him a hypocrite?
What Jimmy Kimmel would be wise to remember is that all the Hollywood bashing of Trump does nothing to turn people against Trump. It actually turns people off against Hollywood. In 2016 almost the entire Hollywood took it upon themselves to mock Trump and demean him in America’s eyes. From Robert De Niro to the Avengers, they took turns to mock Trump. And them America voted and threw celebrity opinions in the garbage where they belong. It didn’t work then. It won’t work now.
The far right barely exists but the mainstream media wants to put it on their headlines at every chance. Hope Not Hate is a political organisation based on fighting fascism and exposing the said far right as racists.
Many outlets, like the Independent and the BBC, are saying that terror acts committed by the Alt Right is becoming more common and that Hope Not Hate is the answer to the said hatred coming from the right. Hope Not Hate announced in their report that 26 attacks by the Alt Right were carried out last year in the UK (this list also includes attacks that were planned but never carried out). Frankly, there was no concerns risen in the report of the growing number of attacks done in the name of Islam – which was responsible for 2,038 attacks worldwide, which left 15,704 people dead and injured 14,356 others
To the untrained eye, fighting fascism may seem like a good thing but the biggest issue is determining what is considered ‘far right’ and what is considered to be ‘normal right’. Hope Not Hate has declared on their site that political commentator and journalist, Tommy Robinson, is a part of the far right. Hope Not Hate has also declared UKIP being a far right party. Britain First has been declared by nearly every organisation on the left to be a far right organisation. This is the definition of far right politics: “Far-right politics is a term used to describe politics further on the right of the left-right spectrum than the standard political right, particularly in terms of more extreme nationalist, and nativist ideologies, as well as authoritarian tendencies. The term is often associated with Nazism, neo-Nazism, fascism, neo-fascism and other ideologies or organizations that feature extreme nationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, racist or reactionary views. These can lead to oppression and violence against groups of people based on their supposed inferiority, or their perceived threat to the nation, state or ultraconservative traditional social institutions.”
According to the definition of ‘far right’, the term is associated with those with the same beliefs as the National Socialist Workers Party or ‘Nazi Party’. The Nazi Party believed in race supremacy, that if you have white skin, blonde hair and blue eyes then you are a part of a master race. Adolf Hitler believed that people with Jewish heritages, Gypsies, disabled people and others who are inferior to him should not be allowed to live. UKIP, Britain First and Tommy Robinson do not share Hitler’s beliefs or goals – therefore they are not far right. This means that the left wing media is clearly lying, trying to get those on the left fighting those on the right under the false impression that half of the country is fascist.
Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel has been in the national limelight ever since Parkland School Shooting occurred. His departm1ent and himself have come under immense scrutiny by both the public and politicians after their debacle in dealing with the Shooter Nikolas Cruz. Sheriff Israel has been mired in controversy throughout his career over several issues. His arrogance and apparent apathy on the issue have been severely criticised by one and all on social media. Here are the seven of his sins he committed.
1.Ignoring Nikolas Cruz: It is a well established fact that Nikolas Cruz’s erratic behaviour, weapons stock, potential danger were well reported to the authorities well beforehand. Sheriff Israel’s office received 23 calls about Nikolas Cruz over the course of the decade according to Sheriff Israel himself. But further records obtained by the media revealed that at least 45 calls were made to the office about Cruz. On February 5th 2016 and November 30th 2017 the tips the office received explicitly stated his threats to conduct a school shooting and his potential for doing so. But the Sheriff’s office and the Sheriff himself have ignored this information repeatedly. This proved to be deadly to 17 innocent lives.
2. His Department’s inaction during the shooting: While the assigned officer to the school resigned due to his lack of action during the shooting, the Coral Springs officers who arrived on the scene were surprised to find at least 3 other deputies waiting outside the building while the shooting was going on. There is no doubt that these 3 officers along with the assigned officer contacted or were in contact with Sheriff Israel at this juncture. But, they didn’t even make an attempt to enter the building. Either Sheriff Israel ordered them to stand down or he couldn’t get them to obey his order. Seen any way this will always be a failure under Sheriff Israel.
3. His reaction after the shooting: As the spotlight turned to him immediately after the shooting, Sheriff Israel displayed extraordinary arrogance and apparent ignorance of his own shortcomings. In a televised town hall meeting conducted by the CNN(he was on CNN even before any investigation had begun or a preliminary facts were verified), he claimed that he had “no responsibility” over the shooting and that it was out of his control and nothing could be done about it. He even made a strange reference to the O.J Simpson case.
4.Blaming the NRA for his failure: In the above mentioned town hall meeting Sheriff Israel, a full blown democrat and Clinton supporter, took full advantage of this spotlight and began to propagate his politics. He actually blamed the NRA for the shooting implying that they were directly responsible for it. This is a shocking act of arrogance and finger pointing for a Sheriff whose own blunders caused the death of 17 innocent Americans. Either he was deliberately trying to defame the NRA for political purposes or he is too stupid not realise his own inaction caused the tragedy.
5. Praising Himself for his work: When your own ineptness and stupidity caused the death of 17 school children, you don’t tend to feel good about yourselves. But, when Sheriff Israel was confronted over this he had high praise for himself. He even outlined his “amazing leadership” and his apparent pride in leading the county. When social media erupted with calls for him resign and the tag #resignSheriffIsrael was trending along with immense public and political criticism he staunchly refused to resign claiming no responsibility.
6. Misuse of his power and position: He and his office have been repeatedly been accused of corruption and abuse of power. In 2016, a local newspaper exposed that he abused and misused his office for taxpayer funded jobs to his political supporters and their family members. When confronted about this, he compared himself to Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King and Gandhi himself and saying he acted no differently. His department employees have also been accused of attending campaign events while on duty.
7.Accepting donations for his PAC from the Mafia: In 2014 Sheriff Israel’s Political action committee accepted thousands of dollars of donations from a convicted felon under the name Yomar Izhak. Izhak is a member of the “Cuban Mafia” an organised crime ring. It deals in cocaine trafficking, arson, gambling and murder among others. And Sheriff Israel was happy to accept money from them and made no attempt to return them when it was exposed to the public.
All in all, Sheriff Scott Israel who was more interested to appear on CNN and politicise the shooting while defaming the NRA than to take part in the investigation is now under immense pressure to resign from his post after the multitude of his sins.
Ever since the horrible school shooting which claimed 17 innocent lives occurred on Valentine’s day in Florida, the mainstream media and social media has been abuzz with many different views, opinions and debates. Both Gun control and anti Gun control advocates have been firing shots (no pun intended) at each other on news media and social media since the day of the incident.
While all this mainstream media has been consumed with propaganda and maintaining the Anti-Trump narrative, several facts have been revealed which raise serious suspicion on the circumstances and the narrative built around the school shooting. Let us go through four of those points.
1.FBI’s ignorance and inaction: While this has been covered a lot on both news media and social media, it is still a bit shocking to realise that the nation’s premier investigative agency did nothing to prevent the shooting even after multiple warnings. In September of last year, a user named “ nikolas cruz” commented on a Youtube video that “ Im going to be a professional school shooter”. The video’s uploader immediately reported the comment to the FBI. But, according to FBI agent Robert Lasky the FBI was “unable” to track down the user. Yes, the very same FBI which was investigating whether elite Russian hackers infiltrated and influenced the American election couldn’t track down a Youtube user with all it’s might. Then, on January 5th 2018 the FBI received a tip from a person close to Cruz that warned about Cruz’s gun ownership, desire to murder people, his erratic behaviour and constant threats on social media. The tipster even warned that Cruz had all the potential to conduct school shooting and would probably do so. Yet again FBI didn’t take any action. It even broke protocol by not reporting this to the Miami Field office which could have prevented the massacre.
2. The reaction of the Authorities on present on the scene: As Nikolas Cruz was shooting down his schoolmates inside the school building there were at least three armed deputies outside the building. But, they didn’t go in and help. They just took cover outside. The armed school resource officer who was assigned to the school did not even make an attempt to enter the building. He was even trained in active shooter training but took cover for four full minutes as the shooting ensued inside. And when the Coral Springs officers arrived on the scene, they found three additional deputies along with the assigned officer behind their vehicles. This broke the Active Shooter protocol which requires an officer present on the scene to immediately neutralize the attacker without waiting for back up. The Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel is under immense criticism for from the public and the politicians for his response to the shooting and the previous warnings. His office received 23 calls about Cruz over the decade. Israel, a gun control advocate and a Democrat has been photographed before in a one on one meeting with Hillary Clinton. He is also accused of having an illegal relationship with a 17 year old girl and forcing her to have an abortion.
3. David Hogg and Co. : Since the day of the shooting the Mainstream media outlets like CNN have given lots of airtime to David Hogg, Emma Gonzalez and other member of the Never again MSD group. But no one has been given as much airtime and talking chances as David Hogg. David Hogg is the son of former FBI agent and has been appearing constantly on CNN and other mainstream news networks parroting the same narrative over and over again. He was even seen in selfies with the news teams. When some sharp eyed users pointed out he was also seen in a previous news interviews from Los Angeles in August 2017, they were quickly shouted down and called as Neo Nazis or Russians. When a Youtube video exposing this became the No.1 trending video on Youtube, it was immediately removed citing “harassment and bullying”. When Infowars uploaded a video showing David Hogg struggling to remember his lines, it was also removed and the channel received a “strike” against it which prevented it from uploading any videos for two weeks. Google, Facebook and Instagram have all announced that they would remove any content that would suggest an opposing view. Anyone even suggesting otherwise have been “officially” labelled as Neo-Nazis and conspiracy theorists or laughably as Russians even though all of them are full blooded Americans living the in the USA.
These points along with several others raise more suspicion than ever that the general public is not given the full picture.
All in all, the Democrats, liberals, the mainstream media and the tech giants seem to be stubbornly maintaining the Anti-2nd amendment, Anti-Trump narrative while censoring and muting the real voice of the American public.
It’s not the fault of the minorities for being fooled into thinking what they are fighting for is skin color and equal rights. This claim use to be valid, over a hundred years ago they had every right to be freed for the bondage of slavery to be equal. So we as Christians finally holding to our bibles for once not twisting the words to fit our needs, stood up to free all slaves.
Thus created the civil war so many years ago, after wining this monumental victory england and other nation followed suite. Slavery was no more in the colonies you saw the rise of ethnic groups and a new population rise. One of the groups claim a phrase in response to “White Power” calling it “Black Power” supposedly to combat the kkk of america. The group’s name was “The Black Panther”, seemly back then it was to combat the KKK, white supremest and Neo Nazis. Once Malcolm X entered the picture the group took a turn for the worse, attacking whites and proclaiming Islam as the teacher of its knowledge. When Malcolm X attempts failed to gather much black folks to his side. looking at his oppnet Dr. Martian Luther king Malcolm knew he was was getting to much of the voice on equality form black folks.,so Malcolm X had to some how take Martain Luther King out of the picture. So Malcolm Spoke to his Islamic Cleric his superior gave him money from Islāmic Iranian’s. Some belive as I do, that Martin Luther King was a victim of Islam, they didn’t want to share with Christian black folk the power over the black people in america. if we look back on it now Islam wanted control and now has control.
After the assassination of Martin Luther King the Black panther party became the new head of the black movement in the 60’s and 70’s. The christians black equality movement had finally been toppled because there leader Martin Luther King’s passing. So as all pawns go Malcolm x in Islams eye’s had to go, for fear of the leak of the assanation of MLK would exspose the nation of Islam for the murder of Martin Luther King. So In the end, Islam assassinated Malcolm X and wiped the truth clean with blood shed and secrets.
The man known as Louis Farrakhan Sr., helped in the murder of Malcolm x and never got punished, he is a local figure-head in most black movements to this day. The reason the spread of black power groups went to other nations is because groups like the nation of Islam and other Islāmic organizations have spread the movement. When you see “Black Lives matter or black panthers, you’re seeing merely pawns for the Nation of Islam, most don’t even know they are the pawns in a sick and twisted game.
Islam pray’s on black youth and minoritys to become part of the Islamic rights revolution, but not nessesarily converting them to Islam. but instead using them on the pretence of racial oppression. More are unaware of the reality they are in, in Islam color doesn’t matter.
Just like the democrats of the United States of America black people are being used as a pawn in sick game to start a race war for Islam.
I have provided an informational link to understand how Louis Farrakhan plays a part in this world’s Islāmic attacks.
Why black lives do not matter but Islāmic black lives do.
If you are a white person and are thinking of watching or reviewing the Marvel Superhero film Black Panther, then you are racist according to some liberals. Even if you wanted to watch it so bad you have to wait till the second or the third week after release so as to not disturb all the blacks who are watching the film with your mere presence. Because liberalism is all about love, peace, tolerance and unity.
One of these rare gems is Tyler Baines Cadbury. According to his Twitter bio he is a journalist from London. He is also “non-binary” (which means he is confused about which bathroom to use) and “race queer” (whatever that is). To cap it off he is a self described male feminist. On 13th February he tweeted that : “White people shouldn’t be allowed to review Black Panther lest their innate racial bias subconsciously reflect in their reviewing. White people simply can’t be impartial. PoC only please”. While this tweet doesn’t make any sense it highlights the flawed thinking that has led liberalism to its present place in the gutter. When some users pointed out his apparent racism, he immediately resorted to calling them “bigots”. And to make matters even worse he says that males giving flowers to females on Valentine’s Day is “rape culture” because the flowers do not consent to be picked and people giving each other flowers is a form of “sex trafficking”. He calls for everyone to boycott it.
And then there is Emily Lakdawalla, a self proclaimed “Planetary evangelist” who tweeted that she was careful so as to not buy tickets for Black Panther on the first weekend because she didn’t want to be the “White person sucking black joy out of the theatre”. Then she proceeded to ask if watching it the next weekend wouldn’t be so racist. When some users pointed out her obvious idiocy she immediately proceeded to block them. She eventually seems to have deleted the tweet herself.
The point these geniuses seem to miss is that the cast of Black Panther, who are predominantly black wouldn’t be pleased with this virtue signalling move after the amount of time and money they spent on making the film. Instead of uniting people regardless of their race and skin colour these liberals are only driving the wedge deeper and causing more division between races by claiming a certain race should not be allowed to watch or review a film based on their skin colour. While most blacks seem to have no problem with any people watching the film, only the fringe elements of the left that take this narrative upon themselves. Recent trends and polls show that increasing number of blacks are leaving the left and leftist parties.
Meet Zhong Zhong and Hua Hua, the first primates to ever be cloned on record. They are identical crab-eating macaques cloned using the same technique that claimed the first ever successful mammalian clone, Dolly the sheep. They were named after the after the two characters that make up the China’s name in Chinese, Zhonghua (中华). The two of them are the first births of the six pregnancies from the placement of 21 cloned ovas, and are expected to be joined by more of the clones soon. They were born at the Institute of Neuroscience of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Shanghai.
Previously, besides Dolly herself, 23 mammalian species including cattle, cats, dogs and horses were cloned using the somatic cell nuclear transfer technique or SCNT. However, cloning primates eluded success until now. The failure in earlier attempts are blamed on epigenetics, a branch of biology that deals with heritable traits that affect gene function and expression and may even persist through generations of progeny despite not modifying the underlying DNA sequences. SCNT works by removing the nucleus of an egg cell and essentially transplanting a nucleus with the DNA from the cell of the individual whose clone is desired. Put simply, external factors within the egg that controlled gene expression within the cell prevented it from dividing into a successful clone, a problem remedied by the Chinese researchers using a couple of enzymes to eliminate the interferences.
While the birth and life of Zhong Zhong and Hua Hua aren’t technically the first mammalian “clones”, the earlier specimen called Tetra, a rhesus macaque, was the result of the embryo splitting technique, which is artificial reproduction of the same natural process that results in identical twins, that is artificial twinning in effect.
Though the breakthrough can bee seen as an enabler to studying more diseases like the eponymous lab rats, concerns are already abound that this development brings us closer to cloning humans, since homo sapiens are also scientifically classified as primates. The director of the Institute of Neuroscience, Muming Poo, emphasizes on using the genetically-identical monkeys to advance the research of diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s and Parkinson’s, while crab-eating macaques are already an established model organism for researching atherosclerosis. At the same time, he vigorously denied using the successful momentum on anything remotely human.
Beyond cloning, the SCNT itself is championed for its potential of “therapeutic cloning” to advance regenerative medicine to clone entire tissues or even organs as a method to replace or repair damage. Its viability in that frond are still subject to debate, however.
On Monday, January 29, President Trump signed the Thomasina E. Jordan Indian Tribes of Virginia Federal Recognition Act of 2017, otherwise named H.R. 984. The new law grants federal recognition of six of the Native-American tribes of Virginia, allowing them to access federal funds for housing, health care, and education. The bill has finally been signed, after years and years of lobbying from Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, of Virginia, who have referred to the lack of federal recognition, an ‘injustice’.
The six tribes under recognition of the bill are: Monacan, Chickahominy, Eastern Chickahominy, Upper Mattaponi, Rappahannock, and the Nansemond tribes. The 4,400 people from these tribes have sought for nearly two decades to receive federal recognition. In addition to allowing federal funding and recognition, the bill will allow them to repatriate the remains of their ancestors, some of which lie at the Smithsonian. “It’s a very happy day for all Virginia Indians, and I think it’s a very happy day for the Commonwealth,” said Chief Stephen Adkins, who proudly represents the culture and heritage of the Chickahominy. “We went through the terrible time when the Commonwealth turned its back on us and allowed officials to take the pen and commit paper genocide. We wanted that day of reckoning,” he said, referring to January 29, when the bill was signed.
Assistant Chief of the Chickahominy, Wayne Adkins, stated, “It helps ensure the future of our tribes. it gives us more resource to do archives, to collect history, to teach the children and even some of the adults.” Hitherto, the tribes had only been able to teach their kids, up to eighth grade, then they would have to continue their education in Oklahoma, or elsewhere, if they wished to pursue further. Akins’ ancestors have long looked forward to this day, when injustice would be made right, as he explained, “The day the bill passed, people said [the ancestors] were probably in heaven dancing, because we achieved a goal.”
He continues, explaining his desires for his children, “Our responsibility is to not let our culture die. I don’t want my children, nieces and nephews, to only be an Indian; I want them to be a citizen of the United States also, so they’ve got two roles.” Doris Ann Austin, an Eastern Chickahominy Counsel Member, states, in regards to their bright future, “This is so much for them. I hope we get grants for education and healthcare,” said Austin.
The bill passed the house in May, then on the Thursday of January 11, the Senate sent the bill to Trump’s desk, when senators Mark R. Warner and Tim Kaine forced a surprise vote. When Trump signed the bill, they spoke in a joint statement, “Our country is finally honoring [the tribes] with the recognition they deserve. We are inspired by the tribes’ leaders who never gave up.” They conclude, together, “Today closes a chapter on a decades-long pursuit of justice for Virginia’s tribes. Virginia’s tribes have loved and served this nation, and today our country is finally honoring them with the recognition they deserve.”
In defense of this position, he said that he doesn’t believe the British people “voted for a Brexit that would cause them to lose jobs, where people’s incomes would fall, so let’s have a sensible Brexit that’s good for the UK and people who live in the UK.” He proposed following the Norwegian model, in which the participant isn’t a direct member in the European Union, but still a member of the customs union and having access to the single market.
The position Jones builds on here follows a new analysis commissioned by the Welsh government which showed that a hard Brexit could cause the Welsh economy to decrease by up to 20%. He summarizes the rest of the reasoning of his position in the following way: “Nobody can convince me or show any evidence to suggest we’d be better off outside the customs union. Europe is our main market: 90 per cent of our food and drink exports go there, 60 per cent of our overall exports go there and it’s on our doorsteps. You’re never going to replace that kind of market. Leaving the customs union is economically daft, it’s a step driven by ideology and nationalism, not by common sense and pragmatism.”
He later told The Independent that “All we want is a sensible Brexit, not one that is going [to] push us off the edge of a cliff.”
But many Brexiteers might object what the point is of having a Brexit without leaving the customs union and the Single market. A major concern with Labour is whether they even want to leave the Union at all. Most Labourers don’t. According to Stephen Bush (https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/brexit/2017/08/labour-s-new-brexit-policy-finally-offers-remainers-glimmer-hope) of NewStatesman, Labour “can agree on what words to say, but is divided over what they mean” on the Brexit issue. He said that most Labour members in the country are in the “more Europhile wing” of the party, which consists of, i.e., Jones, who wants to remain in the customs union and the single market, while there are also another group, called “Lexiteers”: Left-wingers who think it necessary to leave the union. Corbyn allegedly “feels a sense of obligation” to this faction of the party, as they backed his first leadership bid in 2015.
The problem then is that he can’t please this antithesis. With just a year remaining to Brexit, Corbyn must soon take a firm decision on his stance on the issue, and Jones hints what that is going to be.
According to Bush, however, are both Europhiles and Eurosceptics well-represented in Corbyn’s inner circle. He also claims that Corbyn “is more Eurosceptic than the Labour mainstream, but is happy to adopt a pro-European pose when necessary to secure his leadership and to defeat Theresa May.”
UK – Downing Street has announced that they are creating a new national security unit with the purpose of targeting fake news. This has been stated to be primarily against propaganda by foreign governments, especially by Russia. Prime Minister Theresa May held a speech in November targeting Russia, claiming they had been “meddling in elections, and hacking the Danish ministry of defence and the Bundestag [German parliament], among many others.” She also said that they are trying to “weaponize information,” by planting fake stories and photo-shopped images on social media “in order to sow discord in the West and undermine our institutions.” She even went so far as stating that the UK may “return to the Cold War” if it continues, and that the UK have to do their part to protect the interests of the UK, Europe and the rest.
“To do this,” she said, “we will build on existing capabilities by creating a dedicated national security communications unit. This will be tasked with combating disinformation by state actors and others.” Her spokesman said that this is why they decided to create a new national security unit, and claimed it will “more systematically deter our adversaries and help us deliver on national security priorities.” She also stated, however, that it was still unknown who would staff it or where it would be based.