Fact or Fiction: A List of Conspiracies, Conspiracy Theories and Phrases Relating to Them

By Penny Hoffmann

Many people enjoy a thriller, some even a horror; but what if the same scenarios that cause us to sit on the edge of our seat, hold our breath, or cry silently or out loud encapsulate our reality?

“Waking up” from the lulling of society is gradual and heart-wrenching. It leads to one questioning academia, governments, figures, and much of what one was unaware of when travelling this path we call life. In a world full of deception and suffering, it can be difficult to distinguish between what is fact and what is fiction. Those who want to further deceit and suffering for their own personal gain will muddy the waters in an attempt to prevent truth seekers from discovering and sharing the treasure hidden deep beneath the surface. Sometimes this treasure is located in shallow water, but the only way to discover the depth of the deception is to inch in. Jumping is too risky depending on the muddiness. It could be fatal. When we explore, fufilling the curious nature of humanity, we strip ourselves of our assumptions and replace these with a solid foundation, altering much of our identity.

I have noticed that, when discussing conspiracies and conspiracy theories, the two phrases are sometimes mistakenly used interchangeably. There is a difference between conspiracies and conspiracy theories. When an event is classed as a conspiracy, it means it actually took place, whereas a conspiracy theory is exactly what it suggests; it is a theory. It has not been proven.

Some are so overwhelmed by the scale of knowledge they wonder where to start their research. To make this process easier, here is an exhaustive list of conspiracies, conspiracy theories, and relative phrases.

Illuminati/Illuminati. Silicon Valley. Transhumanism. Satanism. Lucifarianism. Collapse of Syria = Sunni-Shiite War = Benefits Israel. GMO’s. 9/11. Chemtrails. Area 51. NWO. JFK Assassination/Kennedy Bloodline. Rothschilds.RFID Chip. D.U.M.B.S. Moon Landing. Rigged Elections. Orangemen. Controlled Media/Media-Government Alliance. Secret Societies. CERN. HAARP. 2030 UN Agenda. Clinton Crimes. Bohemian Grove. Black Pope. Jesuits. Aliens. Blood Sacrifices. Project Bluebeam. Fema Camps. Jewish Question. Woman Question. Social Media Agenda. Astor Bloodline. Bundy Bloodline. Collins Bloodline. DuPont Bloodline. Freeman Bloodline. Kennedy Bloodline. Merovingian. Li Bloodline. Onassis Bloodline. Rockerfeller Bloodline. Russell Bloodline. Van Duyn Bloodline. Hollywood Crimes. Opus Dei. Roman Catholic Church. Academia Lies. Government Lies.

EU/UN Agenda. Monarchy – Jack The Ripper Is a Group of People. Scientology. Freemasonry – e.g. Prominent Figures. Lucis Trust. New Age Movement. Central Banking/Federal Reserve. Cancer. Pine Gap. Ebola. AIDS. Gnostic Philosophy. Giants. Antarctica – e.g. German technology. Nikola Tesla. Biblical Literalism. Annunaki. Atlantis. Rosicrucianism. Egyptian Religion in America/Monarchy. Holocaust. Brotherhood of the Snake. Cohen Bloodline. Intelligence Agencies. Feminism. Sexual Revolution. Founding of Washington DC Truth. 2016 Election – E.g. Seth Rich. Bush Family. Cloning. Technological Revolution. Romanov Family. Julius of Norwich. Prophecy Contradicting Christ’s Coming. Sir Francis Bacon. Alice Bailey. Hosea Ballon. King Bulan. John Dewey. John Foster Dulles. Mary Baker Eddy. Benjamin Franklin. Frederick Franz. Manly P. Hall. Albert Pike. Pope John Paul II. Rockefeller family. Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Saint-Simon. Robert Schuler. Joseph Smith, Jr. H.G. Wells. Rabbi Stephen Wise. Julian the Apostate. Racemixing.

Agenda 21. Georgia Guildstones. Project Blue Beam. Codex Alimentarius. EMF’s Project Garden Plot. Anglo Saxon Mission. Sinkholes. Weather Control. Cannabis Oil. Skull and Bones. Club of Rome. Kabbalah. Fake UFO’s. Vitamin B17. Project Avalon. Denver Airport Murals. Fluoride + Aspartame Side Effects. Nuclear Weapons History. Vaccines. Secularism. Public Education. Taxation. Hegelian Dialectic. Brexit. Symbolism History. Abortion. Euthanasia. Catholic Church Islam. Evolution. Slavery. Pedophillia. Qanon. Drugs. Morgellons Disease. A.I. NASA. Genesis 6. Astronomy. Founding of U.S. US-Patent-6506148b2. Pizzagate. Mafia. Fidel Castro Death. Lyndon B. Johnson Death. KGB. Abraham Lincoln Death. MLK Death. Hitler Death. Howletts Zoo Lord Lucan. Üst Akil. DNC Emails. Israel Animal Spying – December 2010 Egypt Shark Attacks, 2011 Sandi Griffon Carrying Israeli-Labelled Tracking Device. Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Russian Media Run By Armenians. Zionism. Love Jihad. Eurabia Theory. Babylon Rastafari. Dead Animals Missing Organs. FEMA. Alternative Therapy Suppression. Technology Suppression. Psychotronic Weapons Mass Surveillance. New Chronology/Phantom Time Hypothesis. Nibiru. Israel Spreading Poisons. Fall of West Jewish Prophecy (Esau/Edom vs Jacob). British-French-Israeli 1956 Suez Crisis. Protego Project. Angelfire. Expresslane. Project Couchpotato. Project Dumbo. Project Imperial. Umbrace Component Library Project. Project Highrise. Project Bothanspy + Gyr Falcon. Project Outlaw Country. Project ELSA. Project Brutal Kangaroo. Project Cherry Blossom. Athena Project. Pandemic Project. After Midnight CIA. Assassin CIA. Archimedes CIA.

Scribbles CIA. Weeping Angel CIA. HIVE Project. Project Dark Matter. Marble CIA. Grasshopper CIA. Vault 7. French 2012 Election CIA. NSA Targets World Leaders For U.S Political Interests. German BND-NSA Inquiry Exhibits. NSA World Spying. Italy Hacking Team SpyFiles. U.S DOD Detainee Policies. Stratfor Global Intelligence Emails. TISA. TTIP Agreement + TPP Documents. U.S Military Equipment in Afghanistan (PsyOps). U.S Military Equipment in Iraq. Collateral Murder. Afghan War Logs. Iraq War Logs. Guatànamo Files – Prisoners. Secret Congressional Reports – U.S Relationship With Israel + Financial Collapse. Syria Files. Saudi Files. Brennan Emails – CIA. Sony Files.

SourceAmerica Tapes. Bank Julius Baer Document. Operation SOPHIA (EUNAFOR MED). AKP Email Archive. UN Confidential Reports – Allegations of European Peace Keepers Sexually Abusing Refugee Girls, etc. Western + Chinese Companies Affecting Africa’s Uranium and Mineral Rights. Express. Nexium. MGM. The 9th Circle. Knights of Malta. CIA/FBI Finders. Lithuania Scandals. Kendall Scandal. West Point Scandal. Angers Case. Dutroux Affair. Franklin Scandal. McMartin Preschool. Pedogate. Jimmy Savile. Ep Steins Island, Little St. James’ Island, Lolita.


Over a hundred thousand Americans march in Washington to March for Life. Every year March for Life has a theme, this years was “Unique from day one: Pro-Life is Pro-Science.” We march in the hope that we can affect the change America needs and make the world a safer for the unborn. We march to end abortion in protest in protest of the courts deeply flawed decision and its devastating effect on children and families across the country.

Roe v. Wade is not only unconstitutional but harmful and unjust. 60,000,000+ innocent lives have been legally destroyed since January,22,1973.

 The March for life is in its 46th year with a goal of overturning Roe v. Wade above anything else. Abortion is wrong and should be done away with.

Most recently in reverse to the March for Life, the three-year-old Women’s March seems to spew hatred of Donald Trump rather than coming to term with real life issues.

As both movements are similar and different in various ways. Both are a gathering of passionate men and women around the country. Both are attended by hundreds of thousands of people with passionate and famous speakers. However, it begins to differ there.

The values and priorities of the pro-choice, feminist Women’s March is much more diverse rather than being focused on one issue. The Women’s March is run by social justice warrior activists and a mission of focusing on “Environmental Justice” to “LGBTQIA Rights.”

Mainstream media and CNN won’t broadcast this so here Is what we saw at this year’s March For life joined by famous political speakers:

Pro-life protester holds up sign

Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence made an appearance:

Ben Shapiro:

Rep. Dan Crenshaw greets the crowds:

Kids of all ages in attendance

Dana Homsi

David Cameron wants back into politics?

David Cameron, age 52, resigned from his position as Prime Minister on the 23rd of June 2016 after he called a referendum to see what the general public wanted to do regarding our position in the EU, leave or stay. Cameron was hoping for the majority to vote stay and when he didn’t get the result he wanted he stepped down and left our country in a mess, which was a cowardly move as we are still facing the backlash of his actions.

Recently Cameron has decided that he wants back into politics as the Foreign Secretary, reports say this is because he is “bored sh#tless.”

For this to happen, Theresa May has to be removed from her position as PM which is already more than likely to happen. Not only are the general public fed up of her antics but several other politicians are fed up as well. Theresa May has proposed a 12 month brexit extension which there is no need for, yet again she is trying to prolong the inevitable. This extension will also cost billions of pounds in EU fees which as usual the general  public will be paying for in taxes. Conservative MPs have now told May to ditch her plans and make way for a new leader.


Not only does May have to resign for Cameron to be the foreign secretary but he also has to go through either a by-election or a general election, so if the general public have any sense at all they will not vote Cameron back in.

There is a massive shortage of qualified, logical leaders in the UK and David Cameron is on of the majority that is neither qualified to the level we need him to be nor logical. We need a leader that can see through the corrupt ways of our country.

Photograph by :Graham Flack/Red Sky Shepherds Huts/PA
Cameron has done enough damage, so if he his to be voted back in should he take charge of cleaning up the mess he has made and make us a clean break from the EU?
By Alissa Cook-Gray









Another four Huddersfield men convicted with grooming young girls!

Another four men from Huddersfield have been convicted with sexual assault, forcing children to engage sexual activity, trafficking for sexual exploitation and assault committing severe bodily harm.

Mohammed Akram, Niaz Ahemed, Mohammed Imrani brar and Asif Bashir. The four men, convicted with ten offences from 2004 to 2010, were sentenced on Thursday at Leads Crown Court and, between the four of them, have been sentenced for a total of 36 years.


This followed a case earlier this week where seven men were found guilty of abusing young girls.

The four men found guilty on Thursday have been found to be a part of the 20 man grooming gang that has been convicted for further grooming and abuse. This makes the total sentence for the 20 gang members 257 years.


These are the Men that Tommy Robinson at the end of May this year, got arrested for reporting on because he “jeopardized the case.” Not in one way, shape or form did Tommy jeopardize the case, if the establishment want to point the finger at anyone it should be the BBC in the first place for publishing the article he was reading out loud. In a normal world, that would be the case. However, we live in a world where the establishment is ready to silence anybody that is willing to challenge their poor actions – despite obvious double standards.


The judge told the four men that quote, “The way that you treated these girls defies understanding, this abuse was vile and wicked.” So how is three to 17 years in jail serving these horrible sick animals justice? It simply is not.

From 2004 and 2010, these men continuously abused 15 girls. On Thursday, Leeds Crown Court was told how some of the girls were plied with drugs and alcohol before being abused against their will.

The leader of the group, Amere Singh Dhaliwal, age 36, Huddersfield, was given a life sentence with a minimum term of 18 years by a judge at Leeds Crown Court earlier this year in June. He alone had been convicted of 22 rapes with 11 different girls.

Amere Singh Dhaliwal

After the 4 Huddersfield men were charged on Thursday, it makes the total sentence for the 20 gang members 257 years. On average, this makes each defendants sentence 12.8 years, it is just not enough because by then there is a huge chance they may re offend upon release – due to the resentment withheld in prison. It may also be a question of how religiously devoted these Islamic grooming gangs are and how literally they take the passages in the Quran and whether they would go as far as to die for their creed.

So again… I ask: is now the time to bring back the death penalty in the UK and is deportation necessary to stop these evil men?

By Alissa Cook-Gray








Sex offenders on our streets!

Sex offences have and still are rising astronomically in the UK. Statistics show that over the past ten years the number of registered sex offenders living in the community has risen by more than 80 percent. Between 2006 and 2007, the number of rapists, paedophiles and other sex offenders in the UK, was 30,416. Ten years later (2016-2017), the number has risen to 55,236 sex offenders living in the UK supposedly living under police supervision and other probation services that the general government are paying for through tax. However, how supervised are these sex offenders?

Matthew Falder is one terrific example of a sex offender within the UK. Branded “one of Britain’s most prolific paedophiles. He was sentenced to 30 years for blackmailing his online victims into sending him pictures that are deemed as degrading. He also forced his victims into attacking, raping and assaulting others. Due to the UK justice system being fairly relaxed, Matthew will probably serve around half of his sentence… But what will happen when he is released?

A white Sheffield sex grooming gang, who forced a 15 year old girl into having sex with around 40 men for money, got jailed for a total of 30 years. The gang consisted of three brothers, Chris Whiteley aged 23, Matthew Whiteley aged 25 and Shane Whiteley aged 30. Their awful crime consisted of supplying a 15 year old girl with drugs and alcohol and then continued on to forcing her to have sex with around 40 men for unwanted money at the end of each assault. Chris received 15 years, Matthew received seven years and Shane received eight years, of which they will most likely only serve half of their sentences. So again begs the question, what happens to these awful criminals after they’re released?

Sex offenders that are cautioned, or just released from prison, are added to the sex register. The sex register has every offender from 10th September 1997, when the register first came about. Sex offenders have to register within three days of any cautions or release dates and then they must continue registration on a set basis. Sex offenders that are sentenced with any jail sentence from 30-months to life after they’re release means that they will have to indefinitely register. Jail sentences that are between six to 30 months, after release the offenders have to register for ten years and any sentence below six months, the offender has to register for up to seven years.

Victim helplines:
Rape Crisis:
Helpline: 0808 802 9999 (12-2:30 and 7-9:30)
Helpline: 0808 800 5000 (24 hours, every day)

The problem is that this system doesn’t necessarily stop offenders from offending again. Between 2017 and 2018, 12 sex offenders, of which were previously registered in the West Midlands, were charged with further major offences. Situations like this are constantly getting worse and are happening more and more often justice is just not being served to these awful monsters so the main question now is, is the only way to stop this, the death penalty?
As stated, this is constantly increasing so instead of sitting by and watching WE need to do something!

By Alissa Cook-Gray


How the mainstream media lies about Tommy Robinson.

As many of you know the mainstream media lies to a great extent and continues to lie even when a great majority of their audiences and their targets continuously point it out, however many people continue to believe the lies that target people to portray them in a way that the mainstream media wants them to be seen by the general public. One man, one main target who over the years has continuously been lied about by the government and the main stream media is Tommy Robinson, hero to many, but why have they and are still relentlessly targeting him?

If you’re reading this and you Follow Tommy Robinson on all his social media platforms, you will see videos, live stream videos, comments and captions where Tommy continues to battle the lies that are being told about him, but to those of you that don’t really follow him and his social media platforms will possibly believe the lies that the mainstream media continues to try to brain wash you with.

Tommy Robinson once said, “tearing out a mans tongue does not prove him a liar, it only proves that you fear what he might say”, and this is what the mainstream media and especially the government are trying to do to Tommy.

At the time that WoolRich Crown Court was dealing with “Darren Osbournes”( 48 year old man from Cardiff, responsible for the Finsbury Park attack on the 19th of June 2017, he was accused of driving his van into Muslims who were gathering around a mosque in London, one died at the scene and at least 8 were injured) case, it was reported in the national mainstream media that the crown prosecution service states direct contact between Tommy and Darren via social media. Tommy states on one of his YouTube videos (link below), “i was not contacted by the CPS to inform me that this incorrect claim was being made. I was not warned at all before the start of this trial that my name was going to be used in the opening of a terrorist trail, to prepare my family for the threats and everything that was going to come.” In the YouTube video he then continues to state: “National news papers and journalists then went on to claim Mr Osbourne had received a direct twitter message from me, that’s completely untrue, completely false.” Tommy’s solicitor at the time went through the process of ascertaining whether the misrepresentation of the situation was made first by the press or by the prosecution.


As a result of Tommy’s misrepresentation by the press and/or prosecution not only was Tommy and his family receiving threats of violence and death threats but you-tuber “Ali Dawah” started a campaign to find and publish where Tommy lived. Ali Dawah published a video saying: “A lot of you guys might be asking, what is Ali Dawah doing in a dark place at nighttime? Tommy Robinson can answer where we are he knows where we are”. This then led to an address Tommy’s family lived in ten years ago at the time being outed as his current address all over social media. Tommy then goes on to say “after Ali  Dawah claimed that i lived at number 4 multiple twitter accounts began sharing this old address with photos of the property putting an innocent family in danger”. “It coincided with an online campaign from hard-left activists and Muslims, who were encouraging people to kill me and kill my family, my wife and children.” He had a twitter user who goes by the name “the joker” encouraging people to break into Tommy’s property, “to stab me, stab my wife and stab my children to death”. Tommy and his family received multiple other threats due to the lies the mainstream media has told. This includes videos where Muslim men are saying to Tommy, ” i will cut your mother, ill rape you will eat your mother then ill beat you cause your small, 15″ pal look at that” as the man was referring to his biceps. Another video stated: “I’m telling you i will kill you and take your merchandise, you bloody kuffar pray to your lord because i will kill you and take your merchandise.” These are just a few examples of the hate, death threats and violent threats Tommy Robinson and his family have had to suffer due to the mainstream media and their lies,there are thousands more out there.

Andrew Lawton on the stage at Tommy’s trial on the 23rd October stated that the reason he was there that day was to “come here and cover the facts, that’s why I’m here thank you. Here are the facts that Andrew solely came to Tommy’s trial to state:

1.”My personal favorite was about our friend “Ezra Levant”quote, “he needs to be arrested and hes whipped up hate” is what they said”.

2.”Before the proceedings even started this is what they said about Tommy quote: “he is in contempt of court there’s not really any doubt.”

3.”You see one of the great members of the law enforcement team that have done a lot of great work today said to them at the time there were about 15 hundred people, they said “lets just say a few hundred, quote because “we don’t want to give it any credit.”

One of the most recent lies being told about Tommy is that he “stands to make £1m’ on US speaking tour, which Tommy him self has stated several times on live stream videos and on photo captions, “I’ve not been offered a penny for my American arrangement.. fake news as usual.”

insta tr

Another lie that has been told by the mainstream media about Tommy is that he bought a £950k house out of the money that has been donated to him which is again lies as Tommy states on this post:

last week tr

I urged people to not believe everything that the mainstream media try’s to tell you, they have a lot to answer for. We have to stand together to stop this and many other things from happening.

By Alissa Cook-Gray






Shootings In Chicago Continue To Rise, Once Case Leaves Toddler Killed In Crossfire

Chicago is known to have some of the worse gun violence in the United States, with many crimes leading to fatalities of innocent bystanders. Saturday night, several fatal shootings broke out leaving two dead in total, an 18-year-old man, and a two-year-old boy and 3 others wounded. This is what a typical Chicago weekend entails, a city that has one of the highest murder rates in the country.

The shooting of the two-year-old happened as the toddler, identified as Julien Gonzales was accompanied by an 18-year-old man. They were standing near an ally on North Kilbourn Avenue as shots came in from the end of the Street. The Gonzales, was struck in the neck and was pronounced dead at 11:39 P.M. at Stroger Hospital, while the 18-year-old man was taken to Illinois Masonic Medical Center where his condition for a left leg gunshot wound has been stabilized.

Another shooting led to an 18-year-old high school senior of Butler College Prep, dead on Saturday evening. At approximately 8 P.M., shots were fired at a vigil James Garret, along with others, attended for a 25-year-old woman, whom Garret knew from the neighborhood. The vigil honored the 25-year-old, who was killed in an auto crash on Friday. Now, Garret also received a vigil in his memory from his peers at Butler College Prep. The shooting happened as an argument at the vigil resulted in a man and woman drawing firearms and firing into the crowd.

Garret was running towards safety and was shot in the back. He was promptly transported to Advocate Christ Medical Center, where he was pronounced dead within the hour.

Two others were wounded during the vigil, a 20-year-old woman and a 48-year-old man. The 20-year-old was taken to University of Chicago Medical Center for a gunshot wound to the right arm, while the 48-year-old was also transported to Advocate Christ Medical Center for a gunshot wound to the arm. At this time, neither are in critical condition and are expected to survive.

By Mike Jakub Klusa








Chicago’s Gun Control Laws Are Useless, Gun Crime STILL Soaring And Nobody Is Talking About It

Chicago’s inner city and suburbs have been known for their excessive violence, with reaching numbers so high it’s been nicknamed Chi-Raq, due to the homicide rate and deteriorating environment being compared to the streets of Iraq.

The City of Chicago has been known to, while having some of the highest crime rates in the United States, have some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. With criminals being the ones to have the only simple, untraceable access to obtaining firearms, the general population of the area owns few weapons. Lawful citizens do not purchase illegal firearms because should one be discovered, or it is used in self-defence, the individual can be charged with illegal firearm possession. This leads to black market firearms being more accessible to citizens and criminals alike, than legal traceable firearms. This is mostly due to low socioeconomic status rendering them unable to process all the necessary documentation, and the considerably high amount of taxes the County charges for the paperwork, firearm purchases, and ammunition purchases. Families and lawful individuals, as a result, are unable to defend themselves from violence caused by those who possess illegal weapons.

As of September 25th, 2018, there have been 418 homicides in the city during the year 2018. It seems politicians who are trying to heavily restrict the right to legally possess a firearm, have not caught onto the fact that according to a study conducted by the US Bureau of Justice Statistics, the average number of inmates that illegally obtained firearms used in crimes reached on average 79% in the most gun restrictive areas such as Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles.

The issue is that while most firearms used in crimes are illegally acquired, people who try to use firearms to defend themselves and their families are faced with a dilemma. Owning a firearm legally is difficult for the low-income families due to heavy restrictions that make it difficult for someone of a lower economic standing to purchase a weapon. They can sacrifice a substantial amount of their income to be able to protect their homes, or be unarmed and put themselves at risk. Unfortunately, most are unable to do so, and criminals are aware of this. Unarmed victims must hope for a rapid response time from police, which due to the high volume of crime, is rarely the case.

The average police response time in Chicago can take up to 6.1 minutes, which compared to other cities, is significantly longer and can be detrimental to the subject calling for emergency services. Areas of the United States, where firearms have been more accessible, especially in States like Texas and Arizona, have seen a drastically lower crime rate due to armed citizens having the capability to defend their lives, property, and families, contrasted to Chicago, where lawful citizens cannot do the same, the results can be seen as the homicide toll piles up.

By Mike Klusa and Damien Taylor

Land Expropriation in South Africa Begins, UK Foreign Office Backs Policy in Leaked Email

Land expropriation has officially begun in South Africa this week.

The African National Congress government is now seizing land from white farmers, in particular two properties in the province of Limpopo after talks with the owners to purchase the farms collapsed.

Akkerland Boerdery requested their land’s value of 200 million Rand ($14.1m) so they could afford to survive without the private property, but the government offered just a tenth of that. Now the farms will be taken without consent or compensation.

These are just two or 139 farms on a leaked list of the government’s first targets. Reported originally by South African-based media outlet City Press, this bundle of expropriations will act as a test run of Section 25 of the constitution.

Implementation has commenced six months after it was approved by the multi-party Parliament, and just as former President Jacob Zuma was replaced by Cyril Ramaphosa.

Katie Hopkins is one of the few British political figures discussing the implementation of land expropriation policy, credit: Twitter

This is the goal the Black First Land First political party, who frequently display the slogan, “Land or Death”, has been advocating for.

In addition to this, the South African government has been touring the country asking the public their view on whether the constitutional amendment should be finalized. Since the nation’s racial demographics consist of an 8% white population and a 92% black population (FACT CHECK), the electorate swing overwhelmingly in favour of the land expropriation policy.

Meanwhile in Europe, despite the EU urging its member-states to accept Syrian refugees fleeing from their country’s humanitarian crisis, the same standard need not apply for white South Africans. The continent has maintained its silence on land expropriation as it commences.

President Ramaphosa and ANC Deputy Mabuza wave to supporters, credit: Reuters

In addition, the United Kingdom’s Minister of State in the Foreign Office Harriett Baldwin has clarified the nation’s support for the actions of the South African government.

After Conservative MP Paul Beresford inquired what the UK’s position is on behalf of a concerned constituent, the Minister of State emailed the following response.

‘The British government understands the need for land reform in South Africa’, and Ramaphosa’s promise that “the process of land [re]distribution would be orderly within South African laws … without negatively affecting economic growth, agricultural production and food security” is “welcomed”.

This email was subsequently passed onto the constituent, who leaked the contents to Breitbart London.

Minister of State for the UK Foreign Office Harriett Baldwin, credit: Malvern Magazine

While Ramaphosa may insist white-owned land can be confiscated without “deterring investment”, when the policy was announced investors were immediately alarmed. The South African Rand, the national currency, plummeted overnight to 13.40 per U.S. dollar. And the ever-increasing rate of unemployment hit 27.2% early this month.

Now expropriation has began implementation, who knows how further the economy will be disadvantaged, or more worrying, on how many occasions will the human rights of land-owning farmers be violated.

Only 20% of Brits Oppose the Death Penalty for ISIS Terror Suspects, YouGov Finds

By Ewan Culwich

A mere 20% of the British population condemn the prospect of ISIS terror suspects receiving capital punishment, a poll by YouGov has revealed.

On July 24th, a representative sample of 7,714 adults resided in all areas of the U.K., excluding Northern Ireland, were asked their view on the British government’s decision to discontinue attempts to block Islamic State fighters El Shafee Elsheikh and Alexanda Kotey from being given the death penalty, if convicted in a United States court.

Article 4 image 2
YouGov’s survey results. Credit: YouGov

The British Home Secretary Sajid Javid appears to have the public on his side. In a leaked letter to Jeff Sessions on June 22nd, he wrote: “I am of the view that there are strong reasons for not requiring a death penalty assurance in this specific case, so no such assurances will be sought.”

The demographic groups supporting this decision the least are Londoners, Labour voters, Liberal Democrat voters, and SNP voters – yet overall Scottish opposition stands at just 26%. Class and sex differences were minute.

The two suspects in question, Elsheikh, 30, and Kotey, 32, were detained in January by US-backed Syrian rebels, due to their involvement in a four-man ISIL militant group duped the ‘Beatles’. Now-deceased Mohammed Emwazi, also referred to as ‘Jihadi John’, and Aine Davis, 34, who has already been convicted in Turkey, were the other members.

The four men, all from west London, are known to have facilitated the slaughtering of at least 27 hostages during 2014 to 2015, including American journalists and British aid workers.

Mohammed Emwazi, Aine Davis, Alexanda Kotey and El Shafee Elsheikh
The ‘Beatles’ terrorists. From left to right: Mohammed Emwazi, Aine Davis, Alexanda Kotey and El Shafee Elsheikh. Credit: BBC

The ‘Beatles’ were harsher than most other Islamic State guards, adopting torturous methods such as waterboarding, electroshock and mock executions. In the eyes of the sensible British public, these horrific crimes make the possibility of Elsheikh and Kotey facing capital punishment warranted.

Polls Reveal Majority of Americans oppose the Democrats’ calls for abolishing ICE


By Stefan M. Kløvning

Washington, D.C., National Security – Succeeding Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ primary election victory on Tuesday as the Democratic candidate for New York Representative, the Democrats have increasingly echoed her call for abolishing the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE), calling into question the original purpose of the law enforcement agency. The 28-year-old candidate would be the youngest woman ever elected to the U.S. House of Representatives if she wins over Anthony Pappas in the general election on November 6.

Ocasio-Cortez calls herself a ‘Democratic Socialist’, a term she intends to represent the idea that ‘In a modern, moral and wealthy America, where we have the capacity to ensure that every American can have healthcare, education, and access to dignified housing, we should be able to try to do that as a society by whichever means we can.’ Not surprisingly, she worked as an organizer for Bernie Sanders during his campaign for Presidential Election in 2016, and was congratulated by him after her victory:

Bernie Sanders, however, refused to participate in her and the other Democrats’ campaign to abolish ICE. When asked in an interview on CNN about whether or not he also wants to abolish it, instead of giving a yes-or-no answer, he told Jake Tapper that ‘we need policies that deal with immigration in a rational way,’ which excluded ‘locking up children in detention camps or separating them from their mothers.’ He also called for Trump to sit down with Congress to talk seriously about how to develop these rational policies. Many Democrats have since turned on Sanders for taking this unclear position on ICE, saying he’s on the ‘wrong side of history,’ ‘now a pragmatic centrist Democrat’ and a ‘neoliberal shill.’

High-ranking Democratic officials who have echoed Ocasio-Cortez in this matter include New York Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio and Democratic Representative of Wisconsin Mark Pocan. As the first sitting senator to take this position, Gillibrand said that ICE had become a deportation force, and needed to be ‘reimagined’, as the agency today isn’t working as intended. De Blasio continued the call, asserting ‘You need some kind of agency to deal with immigration, but ICE is not that. ICE has proven it can’t be that. ICE’s time has come and gone. It is broken, it has been sent on a very negative, divisive mission, and it cannot function the way it is.’ Pocan is already working on drafting a bill that would suggest getting rid of the agency.

So, how did the agency originate? According to an account by Time, it was created as one of nearly two dozen agencies created following the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security under George W. Bush in 2003, as a counter-measure to the horrors of the 9/11 attacks in 2011. Cornell University history professor María Cristina García explains that the change from the issue of immigration going through the Department of Commerce and then the Department of Labor, to the new Department of Homeland Security, ‘reveals a great shift in how a society views immigration.’ Olivia B. Waxman of Time elaborates on the idea, saying that ‘If immigration is an economic or work-force issue, it would make sense to place it under the oversight of departments that deal with those issues. Placing immigration in the national security sector, however, reveals a changed focus on the idea of potential safety threats represented by immigrants, asylum seekers, and refugees.’ García says, however, though the link between immigration and national security grew exponentially after 9/11, that’s not where the link originated. It really started after the first World Trade Center bombing on February 26, 1993, and that Congress passed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act (IIRAIRA) under Clinton in 1996, reducing immigration from Latin-American countries. García thinks the calls for the abolition of ICE is linked to many of the new agencies under the DHS having conflicting responsibilities. She elaborates, saying ‘You have, on the one hand, an agency entrusted with preventing another terrorist attack, then you have agencies that deal with refugees and that requires a humanitarian [approach]. Refugee advocates, in particular, doubt that the U.S. can honor its humanitarian obligations if the inclination is to automatically assume that refugees and asylum seekers are potential terrorists.’

The calls for the abolition of ICE, has, however, received plenty of criticism from Republicans, most notably by Trump himself, tweeting on Saturday:

As to what the American people generally think, the latest Harvard/Harry poll (n:1448) sought to find out on June 24-25. They discovered that 69% of the American people opposed disbanding the agency, which included 59% of Democrats and 78% of Republicans. However, there’s actually a significant difference between the statistics of the Democratic base of the political party than the Liberal base of the political ideology, it turns out. Only 47% of liberals questioned in the poll opposed abolishing the agency. Though there were over 150 more Democrats questioned than Liberals, this indicates that moderates both Democrats and Republicans mostly (71%) reject the proposition of abolishing the agency. Another poller, Mark Penn, who served as chief strategist for Hillary Clinton in her 2008 presidential campaign, reported on Thursday that 84% of Americans questioned responded that they thought to notify ICE and overturning illegal immigrants to federal authorities would decrease crime rather than increase crime.

Pocan will likely not get very far with his bill, no matter how well he manages to write it, as he will meet strong opposition by both Republicans and moderate Democrats in Congress when it’s ready to be presented. Additionally, the majority of Americans, as shown above, also reject the idea of disbanding the 15-year-old agency, and consider its responsibilities and work for national security to be important and valuable for the American people. These polls may indicate that this is just another issue that a minority attempts to be the loudest about, and through that affect real change in American politics. They’ve gotten some strong proponents on their side in Congress, but they’ve still got a long way to go if they’ll ultimately manage to disband the agency.


Sneaky Obama gave Iran secret access to U.S. financial system

Written by: Jack Bibiano  –  Follow me on Twitter: @LibertyDragon1  –  Add me on Facebook: Juan Bibiano

          A recent report produced by the GOP shows that Obama is a worse negotiator than anyone ever thought. Not only did Obama fly in over 400 million dollars in untraceable cash, in unmarked planes, he also gave Iran full access to our financial system in lieu of sanctions we had on them. The worst part was that he lied about it. The Obama administration continued to tell congress that there would be no exceptions for Iran, while doing the opposite behind closed doors.

          The newly released GOP report shows that the Obama administration gave Iran “brief” access to the U.S. financial system as part of the terribly-negotiated Iran nuclear deal despite specifically telling Congress that such access would continue to remain banned under terms of the controversial agreement, a report released Wednesday by Senate Republicans reveal. “Officials repeatedly testified to Congress that Iranian access to the U.S. financial system was not on the table or part of any deal,” the majority report of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations goes on to say. Despite those claims, the Treasury Department, at the request of the Obama State Department, “granted a specific license that authorized a conversion of Iranian assets worth billions of U.S. dollars using the U.S. financial system,” the report says. Even after the license was issued, U.S. government officials continued to maintain in congressional testimony that Iran would not gain access to the U.S. system, according to the report.

          Although it is claimed that the conversion to dollars never took place, and there is no claim that the license broke U.S. law, the Obama administration still lied to mislead Americans.. Most Republicans opposed the Iran deal, from which President Trump withdrew last month.

          This report comes just a month after President Trump pulled us out of the Iranian Deal, because it was so terribly negotiated by the Obama administration. Obama agree to give Iran billions of dollars for their cooperation in signing the deal. Many see this as a sign of weakness and cowering to one of the world’s biggest state sponsors of terrorism. Trump believed the deal should have allowed international weapons inspectors to have greater access to Iranian military sites. As it stood, U.N. inspectors weren’t allowed into Iranian military bases. Trump has also hammered the deal for not covering Iran’s missile program and repeatedly emphasized the need to stop the country from developing an intercontinental ballistic missile.

          This is just another example of how the Obama administration lied to congress and misled the American people. The Obama legacy continues to be exposed and dismantled by our current Commander-In-Chief. Odds are that Obama will be in trouble with regards to Spygate. Looks like we’ll have to wait and see.

Syrian Militants expose Obama-era programs that gave weapons “directly to ISIS”

Written by: Jack Bibiano  –  Follow me on Twitter: @LibertyDragon1  –  Add me on Facebook: Juan Bibiano

          Operatives from the Obama administration are now in a scramble as their highly-unethical programs of train-and-equip has come into the light via a tell-all exclusive. The Obama administration had created at least two programs with the supposed sole purpose of providing assistance to various Free Syrian Army (FSA) opposition factions within Syria. The programs were ultimately scrapped after a legacy full of shoddy mistakes and bad judgement. In the end, these Obama-era ambitions became a case test for those who oppose regime change by the U.S. government.

          According to the individual who brokered the deal himself, weapons were placed directly into the hands of islamic terrorists after a botched and poorly thought-out operation by the Obama administration. The source, who had defected from the Syrian army in 2012, claims that he was in direct communication with Al Qaeda’s branch, Al Nusra, in order to gain safe passage for him and his soldiers through a two hour journey from North Aleppo to West Aleppo. This individual was Major Anas Ibrahim Obaid, who is likely better known as Abu Zayd, from his battlefield nickname. Abu’s team was a pentagon-trained task force named “division 30,” which has now been accusing (obviously) of betraying the united state. Zayd told Fox News that, from the comfort of his home in the western Aleppo area, In exchange, the Al-qaeda associate Al-nusra was then given five pickup trucks and ammunition. Division 30 was the Zayd-led militant faction in Syria whose fighters graduated from a US-led training programme in Turkey. The Turkey-based cause was supposedly to forge a force on the ground in Syria to fight against ISIS. Trucks, weapons and ammunition were issued to Zayd by the United States in 2015, as part of a $500 million Department of Defense effort to “train and equip” a new “ideologically moderate” force to combat ISIS. The program, designed to funnel arms to so-called moderate Syrian rebels, proved to be a incredible miscalculation for the Obama administration.

          Another huge miscalculation was explained by Suheil Alhamoud, who was also a Free Syrian army defect. Alhamoud explained that, after a spree of several successful attacks against ISIS forces, he had received a supply of malfunctioning TOWs(anti-tank missiles). Despite having a stated range of more than two miles, some missiles would travel no more than 150 feet. Alhamoud explain that he and his team suffered because of this.. “And so the regime and the terrorists advanced. We were told more TOWs would come, but it took weeks for them to arrive.” Alhamoud goes on to say. Alhamoud has also admitted that Al Nusra managed to steal a number of TOWs, which are worth up to $30,000 apiece.

          Although the CIA has declined to comment on this story, a spokesperson for the Defense Department(DOD) acknowledged that the Obama administration “clearly faced challenges” with the now-discontinued train-and-equip effort.You would think with all the recorded failures and backfires from the program, Obama would have learned his lesson and shut it down. That’s not what happened though. The program didn’t get shut down until Trump came into office. With  at least one government official now admitting failure in their tactics, I think we can all agree this should be a lesson to learn from.

Paris Knife Attack: ISIS terrorist shot by police

By Nikos Tsinakis

Casualty toll so far: 1 killed and multiple wounded with 2 in critical condition

French media named the attacker as Russian born Muslim and French Citizen Khamzat Asimov. The attack happened about 21:30 local time in the busy central Paris Opéra district.  Prime Minister Edouard Philippe said police were on the scene five minutes after an emergency call and the attacker was killed less than nine minutes later. Among the chaos, brave bystanders managed to fend off the knife attacker from chasing a wounded woman into a restaurant, thus greatly minimized the number of people that could potentially have been killed or maimed as well as buying precious time for the counter-terrorist police units to arrive.


A knifeman has killed one person and wounded four in a suspected terror attack in central Paris, French officials say.

The attacker was then shot dead by police in the Opéra district. Witnesses say they heard him shout “Allah Akbar”.

So-called Islamic State (IS) later said one of its “soldiers” had carried out the attack on Saturday evening.

Judicial sources told French media the attacker was a man born in 1997 in the southern Russian republic of Chechnya.

The sources said his parents had been held for questioning.

Interior Minister Gérard Collomb said the victim of the attack was a 29-year-old man, but gave no further details.”

Regardless of the rapid response executed by the French police, the goal of the terrorist has been successfully accomplished. A bloodthirsty Jihadist rampaging through the streets of central Paris while stabbing passersby for nearly 10 minutes is no doubt another demoralizing strike in the EU heartland and a reminder to Parisians that the grave danger looming over their city ever since the November 2015 truck attacks has not yet dissipated.


One thing is clear: no matter how hard the Mainstream Media and the EU government attempts to shift the blame away from their own incompetence towards “religious extremism” and ISIS, it only provides further evidence to the eventual obliteration of their refugee-friendly narrative – Terrorist attacks absolutely increased in parallel to the number of third world migrants and “refugees” arrived in Europe. The self-professed liberal and French President Emmanuel Macron announced on the day of his inauguration last year that the key to combat terrorism is to work alongside middle eastern and African nations towards the goal of eliminating ISIS. His hypothesis, however, does not seem to be remotely accurate or relevant to the current situation in Europe, where thousands of returning Jihadis and terrorist cells have been running loose despite allegedly being on “watchlists”. This begets the questions; why aren’t European governments doing enough to protect their own citizens? How many more European lives must be sacrificed on the altar of multiculturalism and diversity?


The Islamic State has been put on their back foot for years yet there seems to be no reduction in the frequency of terrorist attacks on European soil. The death toll of the terrorist attacks in France in the past three years now adds up to exceeding 230 people.

Although the terrorist has been confirmed to be a Russian born French citizen, it shouldn’t come as a shock to discover his ISIS connection due to his birthplace being the southern Russian republic of Chechnya, an area where Islamic jihadi groups have long been operating in. The 2013 Boston Marathon bombers also happened to come from the same Russian region.

Nationalism a side effect of a neglected majority

By Borislav Ignatov

Philosophy → Ideology based on philosophy → Policies  based on ideology→ Political party leading by example → Way of life → Consequences that come with that way of life.

Politics should be handled with reason and evidence. However, timing is everything with political events can have a massive impact on the political views of the people, here are some examples: New Year 2015 Cologne or this case, Sweden cases ( 1, 2, 3), Italy cases ( 1, 2, 3) UK cases ( 1, 2, 3), Self defense cases ( 1, 2, 3), France cases (1, 2 → multiple examples), even Canada is beginning to feel the consequences of mass immigration due to their kind-hearted nature and progressive nature (1 & 2).

There are only a few of many cases around Europe, and still there is cases that remain unreported, as the mainstream media sees this as an attack on the narrative which they are trying to push. This has led to increasing opposition for the EU, through the rise of nationalist parties such as: National Front (France), Five star movement (Italy), AfD (Germany), National Democrats (Sweden).

Such cases can easily infuriate people and make them harbour extremist views, on the other hand of the spectrum people can also be too accepting, allowing their kindness to bring about their own demise through the disguise of ethical decisions. Helping people is the right thing to do, but at mass immigration is unsustainable if there is no future plan to move back these displaced individuals and even then what happens if they do not want to leave?

In mainstream media nationalistic views are often said to be alt-right, or they are racist, xenophobic, fascists, bigots and the list goes on. However, it is important to understand why people are called those names and why they hold the believes they do. First of all it is important to establish the fact that mass immigration is not good for the asylum seekers or the people/country responsible for harbouring these individuals.

Through mass immigration there is a larger amount of competition when it comes to finding jobs (more competition lowers wages), and people need to eat. Therefore, immigrants whom have not been fully or if at all integrated into these foreign countries that they seek asylum,  may result to a life of crime due to a lack of education, language barrier or even personal choice.

It is difficult to integrate massive amount of people without creating areas that mostly populated by migrants, as a consequence there is no incentive to learn the language, no incentive to accept cultural differences and no incentive for a better life style. Education is a crucial part of any society, and integrating people requires re-education as the only law some of these refugees know, is the law taught in the Quran which in itself goes against the laws of most developed countries.

In addition, can western countries truly afford to house and support all the refugees they are taking, it is simply a ticking time bomb as some countries such as England, the government struggles to look after its own people. By putting the needs of those abroad before the tax contributing citizens, the UK government has shown how their priorities are clearly not in order.

People are tired of being neglected because they represent the majority of the population. People are tired of the religious persecution that comes with harbouring muslim refugees. People are tired of being treated like second class citizens in their own country.

abu hamza29433222_1663847930347138_2499346571687100416_n

One massive problem the EU refuses to acknowledge is refugees and asylum seekers lying about their age and other details in order to be granted asylum. We cannot allow for the people we attempt to help, to allow to divide us and ruin our way of life. When someone goes to the UAE they are expected to abide by their strict if questionable rules, but yet in the western world its different.

Sharia courts and councils have found their way into the UK , and they are a way of avoiding the British justice system, and by law they should be illegal according to the Bill of Rights Act 1689.


Not all muslims are bad of course, but the silent muslim community that disagrees with what is going needs to stand up.

America and Qatar Shake on It






by: William Prophett

April, 18 2018


In a digital Special Report by the U.S. Department of Defense this morning, Chief Pentagon Spokesperson Dana W. White provided a readout of the meeting between Mattis and Al-Attiyah.

Khalid is the Minister of State for Defense Affairs of Qatar, a key character in the war on ideological violence, and has held the position since 2016.  From June 2013 to January 2016, he was Minister of Foreign Affairs.Khalid_bin_Mohammad_Al_Attiyah_2017

Chief Pentagon Spokesperson Dana W. White ‘has a Bachelor of Arts in East Asian Languages and Civilization from the University of Chicago. She studied at Capital University of Economics and Business in Beijing and Hankuk University of Foreign Studies in Seoul. She speaks Mandarin Chinese and French. She is the recipient of the Secretary of Defense Medal for Exceptional Public Service and an MIT Seminar XXI National Security Fellow.’  White has been an irreplaceable partner in the war on biological warfare. – PGP, DoD

General Mattis is self-explanatory, and the readout of his meeting with Al-Attiyah is as follows;

April 18, 2018

Readout of Meeting between Secretary of Defense James N. Mattis and Doctor Khalid Bin Mohammed Al-Attiyah, Minister of State for Defense Affairs, Qatar

Chief Pentagon Spokesperson Dana W. White provided the following readout:

Secretary of Defense James N. Mattis welcomed Qatar Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defense Dr. Khalid Al Attiyah to the Pentagon to reaffirm the strategic security partnership between the U.S. and Qatar.

Secretary Mattis and Dr. Khalid Al Attiyah discussed mutual security interests, including the campaign to defeat ISIS, support for the NATO mission in Afghanistan, and improvements to Al Udeid Air Force Base.

The two leaders affirmed their shared commitment to continued security cooperation. –USFG

As usual, the report is brief and to the point.  Mattis expressed good faith and welcome the Deputy Prime Minister of Defense Affairs for Qatar.  Al Attiyah and he agreed on Pentagon policy in regards to their security agreement with the US, the two had a brief conversation and the two were on their way.  There is nothing unusual about this meeting, with the exception of its brevity.  .Kim_Yo-jong_at_Blue_House

Here’s to hoping the liberals see this as well, and maybe North Korea.  Kim Jong Un probably just hasn’t heard the song ‘No Flex Zone,’ by Rae Sremmurd,’ yet.  Maybe Kim Yo Jong or Dennis Rodman can point him in the right direction.


By the way, if anyone is interested in the training photos etc you can see them all at; Defense.gov/photos